lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [ 33/73] x86, microcode: Sanitize per-cpu microcode reloading interface
From
Date
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 13:07 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 04 Aug 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 14:27 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:43:14AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:04:06AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote:
> > > > > On 2012-07-31 06:43 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > > 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> > > > >
> > > > > Alas, this does not build if CONFIG_SMP is unset:
> > > > >
> > > > > ,----
> > > > > | arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c: In function 'reload_store':
> > > > > | arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c:304:19: error: 'struct cpuinfo_x86' has no member named 'cpu_index'
> > > > > `----
[...]
> >
> > Thanks everyone for working this out.
> >
> > If you combine multiple mainline commits like this, the new commit
> > message should refer to all of them. I've fixed that up this time.
>
> Ben, the backport is also needed on 3.0 and 3.4, do you have your patch
> queue available for download/pull somewhere?

This is in v3.2.26, tagged in git
<git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bwh/linux-3.2.y.git>.
I'll wait for Greg to generate tarballs etc. before sending the
announcement.

Ben.

--
Ben Hutchings
Experience is directly proportional to the value of equipment destroyed.
- Carolyn Scheppner
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-04 20:01    [W:0.227 / U:0.232 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site