Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [ 33/73] x86, microcode: Sanitize per-cpu microcode reloading interface | From | Ben Hutchings <> | Date | Sat, 04 Aug 2012 18:23:41 +0100 |
| |
On Sat, 2012-08-04 at 13:07 -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sat, 04 Aug 2012, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > On Fri, 2012-08-03 at 14:27 +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:43:14AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > > > > On Fri, Aug 03, 2012 at 11:04:06AM +0200, Sven Joachim wrote: > > > > > On 2012-07-31 06:43 +0200, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > 3.2-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > > > > > > > Alas, this does not build if CONFIG_SMP is unset: > > > > > > > > > > ,---- > > > > > | arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c: In function 'reload_store': > > > > > | arch/x86/kernel/microcode_core.c:304:19: error: 'struct cpuinfo_x86' has no member named 'cpu_index' > > > > > `---- [...] > > > > Thanks everyone for working this out. > > > > If you combine multiple mainline commits like this, the new commit > > message should refer to all of them. I've fixed that up this time. > > Ben, the backport is also needed on 3.0 and 3.4, do you have your patch > queue available for download/pull somewhere?
This is in v3.2.26, tagged in git <git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bwh/linux-3.2.y.git>. I'll wait for Greg to generate tarballs etc. before sending the announcement.
Ben.
-- Ben Hutchings Experience is directly proportional to the value of equipment destroyed. - Carolyn Scheppner [unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature] | |