Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 30 Aug 2012 10:38:42 +0800 | From | Lai Jiangshan <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 3/9 V3] workqueue: add POOL_MANAGING_WORKERS |
| |
On 08/30/2012 02:21 AM, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, Lai. > > On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 12:51:54AM +0800, Lai Jiangshan wrote: >> When hotplug happens, the plug code will also grab the manager_mutex, >> it will break too_many_workers()'s assumption, and make too_many_workers() >> ugly(kick the timer wrongly, no found bug). >> >> To avoid assumption-coruption, we add the original POOL_MANAGING_WORKERS back. > > I don't think we're gaining anything with this and I'd like to confine > management state within the mutex only. If too_many_workers() firing > spuriously while CPU up/down is in progress, just add a comment > explaining why it's a non-problem
OK, I drop this patch, Could you add the comment, I'm not good at English.
> (actual worker management never > happens while cpu up/down holds manager positions). >
I don't agree this claim. It happens "rarely", not "never", otherwise I missed something.
Thanks, Lai
| |