Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:14:10 +0200 | From | Daniel Vetter <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] i915: use alloc_ordered_workqueue() instead of explicit UNBOUND w/ max_active = 1 |
| |
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:22:27PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:43:25AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:56:37AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:40:57 -0700, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> wrote: > > > > This is an equivalent conversion and will ease scheduled removal of > > > > WQ_NON_REENTRANT. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> > > > > Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> for merging through any > > tree that pleases you (if it makes merging easier for WQ_NON_REENTRANT > > removal). Or should I just merge this through drm-intel-next? > > I think it would be better to route this one through drm-intel-next. > WQ_NON_REENTRANT won't be deprecated until after the next -rc1 anyway.
Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel@ffwll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48
| |