lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/5] X86/XEN: Merge x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_start and x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_done setup functions and document its semantic
On 22/08/12 15:19, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:22:03PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Attilio Rao wrote:
>>>
>>>> Differences with v1:
>>>> - The patch serie is re-arranged in a way that it helps reviews, following
>>>> a plan by Thomas Gleixner
>>>> - The PVOPS nomenclature is not used as it is not correct
>>>> - The front-end message is adjusted with feedback by Thomas Gleixner,
>>>> Stefano Stabellini and Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>>>>
>>> This is much simpler to read and review. Just have a look at the
>>> diffstats of the two series:
>>>
>>> 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>> 6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>> 5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>> 6 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
>>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> versus
>>>
>>> 6 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
>>> 6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>>> 5 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>>> 6 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
>>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> The overall result is basically the same, but it's way simpler to look
>>> at obvious and well done patches than checking whether a subtle copy
>>> and paste bug happened in 3/5 of the first version. Copy and paste is
>>> the #1 cause for subtle bugs. :)
>>>
>>> I'm waiting for the ack of Xen folks before taking it into tip.
>>>
>> I've some extra patches that modify the new "paginig_init" in the Xen
>> code that I am going to propose for v3.7 - so will have some merge
>> conflicts. Let me figure that out and also run this set of patches
>> (and also the previous one .. which I think you didn't have a
>> chance to look since you were on vacation?) on an overnight
>>
> Which previous one ?
>

This one:
https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/21/369

but I would like to repost the patch serie skipping the referral to
PVOPS in the commit logs, I will do so right now, so please wait for
another patch serie.

Attilio


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-22 22:01    [W:1.319 / U:0.120 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site