lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v2 0/5] X86/XEN: Merge x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_start and x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_done setup functions and document its semantic
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Attilio Rao wrote:
> > Differences with v1:
> > - The patch serie is re-arranged in a way that it helps reviews, following
> > a plan by Thomas Gleixner
> > - The PVOPS nomenclature is not used as it is not correct
> > - The front-end message is adjusted with feedback by Thomas Gleixner,
> > Stefano Stabellini and Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
>
> This is much simpler to read and review. Just have a look at the
> diffstats of the two series:
>
> 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> 6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 6 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> versus
>
> 6 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> 6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> 5 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 6 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> The overall result is basically the same, but it's way simpler to look
> at obvious and well done patches than checking whether a subtle copy
> and paste bug happened in 3/5 of the first version. Copy and paste is
> the #1 cause for subtle bugs. :)
>
> I'm waiting for the ack of Xen folks before taking it into tip.

They are OK by me. Konrad?


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-22 13:01    [W:0.115 / U:0.500 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site