lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] regulator: disable supply regulator if it is enabled for boot-on
Hi Rabin,
Is it resolved the issue you mentioned?

Thanks,
Laxman

On Tuesday 14 August 2012 03:37 PM, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
> If supply regulator is enabled because of boot-on (not always-on)
> then disable regulator need to be call if regulator have some
> user or full constraint has been enabled.
> This will make sure that reference count of supply regulator
> is in sync with child regulator's state.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laxman Dewangan<ldewangan@nvidia.com>
> Reported-by: Rabin Vincent<rabin.vincent@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/regulator/core.c | 7 ++++++-
> 1 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> index 0fffeae..4632909 100644
> --- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
> +++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
> @@ -3614,8 +3614,11 @@ static int __init regulator_init_complete(void)
>
> mutex_lock(&rdev->mutex);
>
> - if (rdev->use_count)
> + if (rdev->use_count) {
> + if (rdev->supply&& c->boot_on)
> + regulator_disable(rdev->supply);
> goto unlock;
> + }
>
> /* If we can't read the status assume it's on. */
> if (ops->is_enabled)
> @@ -3634,6 +3637,8 @@ static int __init regulator_init_complete(void)
> if (ret != 0) {
> rdev_err(rdev, "couldn't disable: %d\n", ret);
> }
> + if (rdev->supply)
> + regulator_disable(rdev->supply);
> } else {
> /* The intention is that in future we will
> * assume that full constraints are provided



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-22 12:41    [W:0.166 / U:0.016 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site