lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [22]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: apparent regressions from TLB range flushing page set
>>> Alex Shi <alex.shi@intel.com> 08/22/12 5:24 AM >>>
>On 08/20/2012 10:12 PM, Jan Beulich wrote:
>I was thought you have 'Agreed' for xen part code. :)

I had agreed to it being done the right way, and I had pointed out the
problem once. I can't say for sure that I looked at the most recent rev
closely enough to spot the issue still being unfixed.

>> For one, while TLB_FLUSH_ALL gets passed as 'end' argument to
>> flush_tlb_others(), the Xen code was made to check its 'start'
>> parameter.
>
>Do you mean need the following change? --untested.

Yes. I'd question though whether for that special case it shouldn't be
start _and_ end to get passed the special value.

Jan



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-22 11:01    [W:0.056 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site