lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH REBASE 1/2] i2c: tegra: I2_M_NOSTART functionality not supported in Tegra20
Thanks for review.

On Saturday 18 August 2012 06:17 PM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> * PGP Signed by an unknown key
>
> On Sat, Aug 18, 2012 at 12:32:34AM +0530, Laxman Dewangan wrote:
>> + bool has_continue_xfer_support;
> I wonder if it makes sense to carry a pointer here to the
> tegra_i2c_hw_feature in use instead of copying all entries by hand,
> since they might get more and more.
>

Ok, we can store the hw pointer in device structure. I will send the new
patch.

>> };
>>
>> static void dvc_writel(struct tegra_i2c_dev *i2c_dev, u32 val, unsigned long reg)
>> @@ -563,7 +574,17 @@ static int tegra_i2c_xfer(struct i2c_adapter *adap, struct i2c_msg msgs[],
>> if (i2c_dev->is_suspended)
>> return -EBUSY;
>>
>> - clk_prepare_enable(i2c_dev->div_clk);
>> + /* Support I2C_M_NOSTART only if HW support continue xfer. */
>> + for (i = 0; i< num - 1; i++) {
>> + if ((msgs[i + 1].flags& I2C_M_NOSTART)&&
>> + !i2c_dev->has_continue_xfer_support) {
>> + dev_err(i2c_dev->dev,
>> + "mesg %d have illegal flag\n", i + 1);
>> + return -EINVAL;
>> + }
>> + }
> Drivers are requested to explicitly check for features of the I2C bus
> (like M_NOSTART) before using them, so I'd skip this extra check.
>

Ok, I kept this as part of flag checking so illegal flag should not be
passed. I will remove this on next version patch.

>> +
>> + clk_prepare_enable(i2c_dev->clk);
> From a glimpse, this change looks unrelated at least. Even wrong, no?
>

It was already there, just before above check. Due to insertion of
check, this code shifted, otherwise it is not a new code.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-18 16:01    [W:0.656 / U:0.096 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site