lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Aug]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRE: [PATCH 0/3] staging: zcache+ramster: move to new code base and re-merge
[Seth re new redesigned codebase]

> From: Seth Jennings [mailto:sjenning@linux.vnet.ibm.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 17, 2012 4:33 PM
>
> So I can't support this patchset, citing the performance
> degradation and the fact that this submission is
> unreviewable due to it being one huge monolithic patchset on
> top of an existing codebase.

[Dan re old demo codebase]

> From: Dan Magenheimer
> Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 11:48 AM
> Subject: RE: [PATCH 0/4] promote zcache from staging
>
> Sorry, but FWIW my vote is still a NACK. IMHO zcache needs major
> work before it should be promoted, and I think we should be spending
> the time fixing the known flaws rather than arguing about promoting
> "demo" code.

:-#

"Well, pahdner," drawls the Colorado cowboy (Dan) to the Texas
cowboy (Seth), "I reckon we gots us a good old fashioned standoff."

"What say we settle this like men, say six-shooters at
twenty paces?"

:-)

Seriously, maybe we should consider a fork? Zcache and zcache2?

(I am REALLY away from email for a few days starting NOW.)

Dan


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-08-18 22:01    [W:0.054 / U:0.404 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site