Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 15 Aug 2012 20:43:49 +0400 | From | Stanislav Kinsbursky <> | Subject | Re: [RFC PATCH 5/5] syscall: sys_fbind() introduced |
| |
15.08.2012 20:30, H. Peter Anvin пишет: > On 08/15/2012 09:22 AM, Stanislav Kinsbursky wrote: >> This syscall allows to bind socket to specified file descriptor. >> Descriptor can be gained by simple open with O_PATH flag. >> Socket node can be created by sys_mknod(). >> >> Signed-off-by: Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com> >> --- >> arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl | 1 + >> arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_64.tbl | 1 + >> include/linux/syscalls.h | 1 + >> kernel/sys_ni.c | 3 +++ >> net/socket.c | 25 +++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 5 files changed, 31 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl b/arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl >> index 7a35a6e..9594b82 100644 >> --- a/arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl >> +++ b/arch/x86/syscalls/syscall_32.tbl >> @@ -356,3 +356,4 @@ >> 347 i386 process_vm_readv sys_process_vm_readv compat_sys_process_vm_readv >> 348 i386 process_vm_writev sys_process_vm_writev compat_sys_process_vm_writev >> 349 i386 kcmp sys_kcmp >> +350 i386 fbind sys_fbind > > i386 uses socketcalls... perhaps it shouldn't (socketcalls are pretty > much an abomination), but for socketcall-based architectures this really > should be a socketcall. >
Thanks, Peter. I'll rework this.
> Don't you also need fconnect()? Or is that simply handled by allowing > open() without O_PATH? >
Yes, I need it. If this approach will be accepted, then I'll send one more patch set for fconnect.
> -hpa >
-- Best regards, Stanislav Kinsbursky -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |