Messages in this thread | | | Date | Sat, 11 Aug 2012 11:39:13 -0700 | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86: revert "x86: Fix S4 regression" |
| |
On 08/11/2012 11:34 AM, H. Peter Anvin wrote: > On 08/11/2012 11:26 AM, Jerry Snitselaar wrote: >>> >>> This patch from Jacob Shin solves the problem, and seems like it might >>> be a better solution. >>> >>> [PATCH 2/5] x86: find_early_table_space based on memory ranges that >>> are being mapped >>> >>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/9/540 >>> >> Actually, apply that series of 5 patches. >> > > I was hoping Tejun would comment on it, but I think I'll pull it into -tip. > > However, the real question is what we should do for -stable; applying > the full patch series seems a big aggressive for that. On the other > hand, if it really is The Right Thing then perhaps we should do so anyway. >
Ah, right... still waiting for a rev of the patch to address Yinghai's legitimate request for minor code restructuring. Other than that, the patchset is really The Right Thing.
-hpa
-- H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
| |