Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: [PATCH] [RFC] syscalls,x86: Add execveat() system call (v2) | From | "H. Peter Anvin" <> | Date | Wed, 01 Aug 2012 17:52:29 -0700 |
| |
Sorry misunderstood your offlist mail I can cook up an x32 binary easily enough.
Meredydd Luff <meredydd@senatehouse.org> wrote:
>On 2 Aug 2012 00:33, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> wrote: >> > Sorry, you're right. The argument vector needs compatibility >support. >> > >> > This means you need an x32 version of the function > >This is why I originally asked you (off-list) whether it was okay to >omit >x32 support in the initial patch :) > >I have x32 code already, but I don't have the toolchain or glibc to >test >it. (Nor the pain tolerance to build the bleeding-edge versions on this >laptop - unless I really, really need to...) > >If you (or someone else with a working x32 toolchain) could build a >static >binary from a tiny test program, I could test that code and put it back >in >the patch. > >Meredydd
-- Sent from my mobile phone. Please excuse brevity and lack of formatting.
| |