lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
    /
    Date
    From
    SubjectRe: [PATCH 0/5] Add vhost-blk support
    On 07/17/2012 07:11 PM, Stefan Hajnoczi wrote:
    > On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 10:21 AM, Asias He <asias@redhat.com> wrote:
    >> On 07/17/2012 04:52 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
    >>>
    >>> Il 17/07/2012 10:29, Asias He ha scritto:
    >>>>
    >>>> So, vhost-blk at least saves ~6 syscalls for us in each request.
    >>>
    >>>
    >>> Are they really 6? If I/O is coalesced by a factor of 3, for example
    >>> (i.e. each exit processes 3 requests), it's really 2 syscalls per request.
    >>
    >>
    >> Well. I am counting the number of syscalls in one notify and response
    >> process. Sure the IO can be coalesced.
    >
    > Linux AIO also supports batching in io_submit() and io_getevents().
    > Depending on the request pattern in the vring when you process it, you
    > should be able to do better than 1 set of syscalls per host I/O
    > request.
    >
    > Are you taking advantage of that at the moment in your userspace benchmark?

    OK. I know that batching in io_submit() and io_getevetns(). There was a
    patch for kvm tool long time ago. Now, both vhost-blk and kvm tool are
    not taking advantage of that atm. There are issues: e.g. How many number
    of request we want to batch? Does this batching hurt latency?

    --
    Asias




    \
     
     \ /
      Last update: 2012-07-18 11:01    [W:4.424 / U:0.000 seconds]
    ©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site