Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: resurrecting tcphealth | From | Eric Dumazet <> | Date | Mon, 16 Jul 2012 13:46:25 +0200 |
| |
On Mon, 2012-07-16 at 13:33 +0200, Piotr Sawuk wrote: > On Sa, 14.07.2012, 01:55, Stephen Hemminger wrote: > > I am not sure if the is really necessary since the most > > of the stats are available elsewhere. > > if by "most" you mean address and port then you're right. > but even the rtt reported by "ss -i" seems to differ from tcphealth.
Thats because tcphealth is wrong, it assumes HZ=1000 ?
tp->srtt unit is jiffies, not ms.
tcphealth is a gross hack.
| |