lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jul]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] ACPI / PCI: Make _SxD/_SxW check follow ACPI 4.0a spec
Date
On Wednesday, July 11, 2012, Greg KH wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 09:04:48PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 11, 2012, Greg KH wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 11:07:56AM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > On Wednesday, July 11, 2012, Greg KH wrote:
> > > > > On Sun, Apr 29, 2012 at 10:44:16PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > > > > From: Oleksij Rempel <bug-track@fisher-privat.net>
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This patch makes _SxD/_SxW check follow the ACPI 4.0a specification
> > > > > > more closely and fixes suspend bug found on ASUS Zenbook UX31E.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Some OEM use _SxD fileds do blacklist brocken Dx states.
> > > > > > If _SxD/_SxW return values are check before suspend as appropriate,
> > > > > > some nasty suspend/resume issues may be avoided.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42728
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Oleksij Rempel <bug-track@fisher-privat.net>
> > > > > > Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > > > > > ---
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Bjorn, Len,
> > > > > >
> > > > > > This is -stable material and therefore v3.4 as well, IMO. Please let me
> > > > > > know if one of you can take it or whether you want me to handle it all the
> > > > > > way to Linus.
> > > > >
> > > > > What ever hapened to this patch?
> > > >
> > > > It was split and partially merged. As far as the other part is concerned,
> > > > the jury is still out.
> > >
> > > Ok, I'll wait for someone to ask for it to be added to the stable tree
> > > before I do anything.
> >
> > In fact, it should have been marked as -stable material, so please add:
> >
> > commit dbe9a2edd17d843d80faf2b99f20a691c1853418
> > Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
> > Date: Tue May 29 21:21:07 2012 +0200
> >
> > ACPI / PM: Make acpi_pm_device_sleep_state() follow the specification
>
> Ah, the name changed, that's why I couldn't find it. Thanks, I've now
> queued it up.

Thanks!


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-07-11 22:01    [W:0.068 / U:0.808 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site