Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 7 Jun 2012 13:35:15 +0300 | From | Boaz Harrosh <> | Subject | Re: [uml-devel] um: TTY fixes (?) |
| |
On 06/07/2012 01:19 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> > No, it works fine. >
OK Sorry I missed that part. So you are saying that these patches fix Fedora, but completely break other systems which now work?
I saw in your cover letter that Debian was fine with or without ->hangup() so I assumed all other system are more like Debian.
>> I don't see Alan's comment at all. This is not a regression it was always >> like that. Ever since Fedora was working on UML, But these fixes are real >> live regression crashes. >> >> And I don't see the all "leaving other vendors systems insecure". It just >> a freaking UML tty. You need to be root 5 times before you have access >> to all these, and it's only the UML that's compromised not the "all system" >> And surely the current plain tty0 crash is much less secure then this thing. > > The "TTY problem" is not UML specific. >
Exactly my point, so it is not anything your UM-only patches can do anything about it. right?
> Thanks, > //richard >
I guess I will have to carry these longer. Can I fix my FC12 and FC15 so they don't crash with mainline?
Thanks Boaz
| |