lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [7]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [uml-devel] um: TTY fixes (?)
On 06/07/2012 01:19 PM, Richard Weinberger wrote:

>
> No, it works fine.
>


OK Sorry I missed that part. So you are saying that these patches
fix Fedora, but completely break other systems which now work?

I saw in your cover letter that Debian was fine with or without
->hangup() so I assumed all other system are more like Debian.

>> I don't see Alan's comment at all. This is not a regression it was always
>> like that. Ever since Fedora was working on UML, But these fixes are real
>> live regression crashes.
>>
>> And I don't see the all "leaving other vendors systems insecure". It just
>> a freaking UML tty. You need to be root 5 times before you have access
>> to all these, and it's only the UML that's compromised not the "all system"
>> And surely the current plain tty0 crash is much less secure then this thing.
>
> The "TTY problem" is not UML specific.
>


Exactly my point, so it is not anything your UM-only patches can do anything
about it. right?

> Thanks,
> //richard
>


I guess I will have to carry these longer. Can I fix my FC12 and FC15 so they
don't crash with mainline?

Thanks
Boaz


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-07 13:22    [W:0.099 / U:0.372 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site