lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 21/40] autonuma: avoid CFS select_task_rq_fair to return -1

* Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com> wrote:

> On 06/29/2012 03:05 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >On Fri, 2012-06-29 at 14:57 -0400, Rik van Riel wrote:
> >>Either this is a scheduler bugfix, in which case you
> >>are better off submitting it separately and reducing
> >>the size of your autonuma patch queue, or this is a
> >>behaviour change in the scheduler that needs better
> >>arguments than a 1-line changelog.
> >
> >I've only said this like 2 or 3 times.. :/
>
> I'll keep saying it until Andrea has fixed it :)

But that's just wrong - patch submitters *MUST* be responsive
and forthcoming. Mistakes are OK, but this goes well beyond
that. A patch-queue must generally not be resubmitted for yet
another review round, as long as there are yet unaddressed
review feedback items.

The thing is, core kernel code maintainers like PeterZ don't
scale and the number of patches to review is huge - yet Andrea
keeps wasting Peter's time with the same things again and
again... How much is too much?

Thanks,

Ingo


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-29 23:21    [W:0.137 / U:0.256 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site