Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 27 Jun 2012 08:15:07 +0100 | From | "Jan Beulich" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] syslog: fill buffer with more than a single message for SYSLOG_ACTION_READ |
| |
>>> On 26.06.12 at 21:55, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:34:49AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: >> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 09:35:03PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote: >> >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote: >> >> >> >> > Ok, so I'm confused, you want me to apply this patch and then revert a >> >> > different one? Which one, 4a77a5a06ec66ed05199b301e7c25f42f979afdc? >> >> >> >> b56a39ac conflicts and is replaced with that patch. >> >> 4a77a5a0 should stay, as it fixes an actual problem, even with the old >> >> code, I think. >> > >> > Ok, I'm even more confused now. Maybe I just need more coffee. >> > >> > Can you list what exactly I should do here? Should I apply this patch? >> > Revert some other patch? Which one(s)? >> >> Revert b56a39ac (return -EINVAL) and apply the patch from Jan. The >> problem b56a39ac solved , is replaced by other logic in Jan's patch. > > Ok, now done, there's nothing else needed here, right?
Thanks - not that I'm aware of.
Jan
| |