lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH] syslog: fill buffer with more than a single message for SYSLOG_ACTION_READ
>>> On 26.06.12 at 21:55, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 02:34:49AM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 2:01 AM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 09:35:03PM +0200, Kay Sievers wrote:
>> >> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 9:20 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> > Ok, so I'm confused, you want me to apply this patch and then revert a
>> >> > different one? Which one, 4a77a5a06ec66ed05199b301e7c25f42f979afdc?
>> >>
>> >> b56a39ac conflicts and is replaced with that patch.
>> >> 4a77a5a0 should stay, as it fixes an actual problem, even with the old
>> >> code, I think.
>> >
>> > Ok, I'm even more confused now. Maybe I just need more coffee.
>> >
>> > Can you list what exactly I should do here? Should I apply this patch?
>> > Revert some other patch? Which one(s)?
>>
>> Revert b56a39ac (return -EINVAL) and apply the patch from Jan. The
>> problem b56a39ac solved , is replaced by other logic in Jan's patch.
>
> Ok, now done, there's nothing else needed here, right?

Thanks - not that I'm aware of.

Jan



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-27 10:01    [W:0.047 / U:0.140 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site