lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
SubjectRe: [PATCH] Add a page cache-backed balloon device driver.
From
On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 7:56 PM, Rusty Russell <rusty@rustcorp.com.au> wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2012 00:41:06 +0300, "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 01:32:58PM -0700, Frank Swiderski wrote:
>> > This implementation of a virtio balloon driver uses the page cache to
>> > "store" pages that have been released to the host.  The communication
>> > (outside of target counts) is one way--the guest notifies the host when
>> > it adds a page to the page cache, allowing the host to madvise(2) with
>> > MADV_DONTNEED.  Reclaim in the guest is therefore automatic and implicit
>> > (via the regular page reclaim).  This means that inflating the balloon
>> > is similar to the existing balloon mechanism, but the deflate is
>> > different--it re-uses existing Linux kernel functionality to
>> > automatically reclaim.
>> >
>> > Signed-off-by: Frank Swiderski <fes@google.com>
>>
>> I'm pondering this:
>>
>> Should it really be a separate driver/device ID?
>> If it behaves the same from host POV, maybe it
>> should be up to the guest how to inflate/deflate
>> the balloon internally?
>
> Well, it shouldn't steal ID 10, either way :)  Either use a completely
> bogus number, or ask for an id.
>
> But AFAICT this should be a an alternate driver of for the same device:
> it's not really a separate device, is it?
>
> Cheers,
> Rusty.

Apologies, Rusty. Asking for an ID is in the virtio spec, and I
completely neglected that step. Though as you and others have pointed
out, this probably fits better as a different driver for the same
device. Since it changes whether or not the deflate operation is
necessary, it also seems that how this should look is different
behavior based on a feature bit in the device.

If that sounds reasonable, then what I'll do with this patch is merge
it with the existing virtio balloon driver with a feature bit for
determining which behavior to use.

I also think the idea of a generic balloon that the different balloon
drivers use for the inflate/deflate operations is interesting and
useful, though I think the suggestion of pending that until later is
correct.

Sounds reasonable?

Regards,
fes
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-27 18:22    [W:0.103 / U:0.556 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site