lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [27]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC, PATCH] CLONE_NEWIPC and exit_group()
Hi,

On Tue, Jun 26, 2012 at 03:04:26PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Patch to move kern_unmount() out of exit_group() code path is below.
> Dmitry, could you check if it's beneficial for your use-case?

I've benchmarked a slightly modified test which is closer to our use-case
(child processes are forked sequentially):

#define _GNU_SOURCE
#include <unistd.h>
#include <sched.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <sys/wait.h>

int
main(void)
{
int i;
for (i = 0; i < 1024; i++) {
if (fork()) {
wait(NULL);
continue;
}
unshare(CLONE_NEWIPC);
exit(0);
}
return 0;
}

On 3.4.4 with rcu_barrier patch:
0.09user 0.00system 0:32.77elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 1472maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+38017minor)pagefaults 0swaps

On 3.4.4 with rcu_barrier patch and your new patch:
0.00user 0.06system 0:32.77elapsed 0%CPU (0avgtext+0avgdata 1472maxresident)k
0inputs+0outputs (0major+38017minor)pagefaults 0swaps

So there is a clear difference in accounting (user vs system) but no
noticeable difference in the real time.


--
ldv


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-27 15:21    [W:0.117 / U:0.056 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site