Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 26 Jun 2012 11:23:37 -0400 | From | "J. Bruce Fields" <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 1/1] locks: prevent side-effects of locks_release_private before file_lock is initialized |
| |
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 10:10:35PM -0400, Filipe Brandenburger wrote: > Just to let you know that I just tested the patch below on top of > 3.5.0-rc4 and it works fine... > > Do you like the idea of this second patch or do you prefer the > __locks_free_lock() one?
Like I said:
> Let's just go with your first patch and free the thing by hand (but > add a comment explaining why). > > Then come back and figure out how to make the interface clearer once > we've got the bug fixed.
--b.
| |