Messages in this thread | | | From | Andi Kleen <> | Subject | Re: [RFC] Introduce to batch variants of accept() and epoll_ctl() syscall | Date | Mon, 18 Jun 2012 16:27:47 -0700 |
| |
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> writes: > > I believe accept() is the problem here, because it contends with the > softirq processing the tcp session handshake.
The MOSBENCH people some time ago did a per CPU accept queue. This is probably overkill, but there are clearly some scaling problems here with enough cores.
-Andi
-- ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
| |