lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] Introduce to batch variants of accept() and epoll_ctl() syscall
Date
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> writes:
>
> I believe accept() is the problem here, because it contends with the
> softirq processing the tcp session handshake.

The MOSBENCH people some time ago did a per CPU accept queue. This is
probably overkill, but there are clearly some scaling problems here
with enough cores.

-Andi

--
ak@linux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-19 02:01    [W:0.118 / U:0.664 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site