Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Jun 2012 23:10:52 +0100 | From | Ken Moffat <> | Subject | Re: nfs3 problem with -rc{2,3} |
| |
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 10:03:24PM +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote: > On Mon, 2012-06-18 at 22:53 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 09:05:25PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote: > > > > > > I suppose I'll have to enable v4 in my configs. > > > > > Just to confirm, -rc3 with CONFIG_NFS_V4 added to my original > > .config appears to work fine on nfs v3. > > > > I suppose I could apply 4f97615d19c370d1d907ef37f8bcd9c3672851ca on > > top of the conmits which failed to compile without v4, if it is worth > > investigating this ? It certainly fixes the error in fs/nfs/read.c, > > but I also had: > > > > fs/nfs/direct.c:86:29: error: field ‘ds_cinfo’ has incomplete type > > > > in 3e9e0ca3 which would still prevent me testing at least some of > > these commits. Seems to have been fixed *somewhere* in that series, > > otherwise 4f97615d would not have compiled. Any suggestions for > > that ? Alternatively would it be useful if I discovered which > > commits are affected for ds_cinfo, or should I just follow the good > > Dr.Pangloss and add V4 to my config ? ;-) > > Doesn't 4f97615d19 fix the fs/nfs/direct.c problem too? It should. > > Anyhow, if you can apply that on top of the commits that didn't compile, > and then continue the bisection, that would be great. We definitely do > want the !defined(CONFIG_NFS_V4) case to work in 3.5-final... > OK (I was assuming errors in different places were from different causes). I'll do that after I've rerun rc3 without NFS_V4 with SUNRPC_DEBUG. Thanks.
ĸen -- das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |