lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [18]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC PATCH] pch_uart: Add eg20t_port lock field, avoid recursive spinlocks
On Mon, Jun 18, 2012 at 02:41:46PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
>
>
> On 06/05/2012 04:48 PM, Tomoya MORINAGA wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 6, 2012 at 7:07 AM, Darren Hart <dvhart@linux.intel.com> wrote:
> >> Are there still concerns about the additional lock? I'll resend V2
> >> tomorrow with the single whitespace fix if I don't hear anything back today.
> >
> > I understand your saying. Looks good.
> > However, I am not expert of linux-uart core system.
> > So, I'd like UART maintainer to give us your opinion.
>
> Greg, Alan,
>
> any concerns with the locking approach I've adopted in the patch?

Care to resend the patch, as it was a RFC one, it's no longer in my
queue.

thanks,

greg k-h


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-19 01:01    [W:0.044 / U:2.824 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site