Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 18 Jun 2012 11:10:03 +0800 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] x86: revert "x86: Fix S4 regression" | From | Cong Wang <> |
| |
On Fri, Jun 15, 2012 at 8:15 PM, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> wrote: > At Fri, 15 Jun 2012 19:11:12 +0800, > Cong Wang wrote: >> >> On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Cong Wang <amwang@redhat.com> wrote: >> > >> > Takashi, could you help to test if the S4 regression is still >> > there after this patch? >> >> Hello, >> >> Any comments? >> >> I have tested this revert on my laptop, with running simple >> "suspend and resume" test for several times, I didn't see any >> problem. > > Sorry for the late response. > > The problem happens only on certain laptops. I've tested the recent > IvyBridge laptops and these were OK with the reverted patch. But a > SandyBridge laptop, the one I tested in the last year, still hits the > S4 problem with the reverted kernel.
Yeah, but the crashkernel=512M regression seems to happen on more machines. :)
> > But, the recent kernels seem to have other S4 problems on this > machine, so it's not 100% clear whether it's triggered by that. > At least, it jumpts to the boot at S4 resume more frequently when the > patch is reverted. > > So, I need to start from 2.6.32 again to see what regressions have > been introduced. It'll take time, since I'd have to S4 20 cycles > for reproducing the bug. >
Ok, thanks for your update! -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |