lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Jun]   [14]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH v3 0/4] DT clock bindings
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 11:23:18AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Right. This is why I have reposted and copied those whom commented on my
> pull request. I think at least some of Saravana's concerns boiled down
> to not requiring using DT clock bindings and not requiring driver
> changes to move to DT bindings. Both of these are met with this series.
> A platform can still use clkdev tables for binding clocks to devices and
> does not have to use DT for clocks. Drivers generally should not require
> any changes that I'm aware of, but if there are any concrete examples
> I'd like to know.
>
> Yes, I think this should go thru you.
>
I still have a little doubt about how this binding will best work for
imx clock. I'm trying to cook a RFC patch discussing.

--
Regards,
Shawn



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-06-14 11:22    [W:0.041 / U:0.316 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site