Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 14 Jun 2012 07:41:25 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH V5 0/13] perf: Intel uncore pmu counting support | From | Stephane Eranian <> |
| |
On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 4:18 AM, Yan, Zheng <zheng.z.yan@intel.com> wrote: > On 06/13/2012 05:02 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: >> On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 09:41 +0800, Yan, Zheng wrote: >>> Peter suggests keeping the uncore names as they're listed in the intel >>> doc. For Sandybirdge-EP, uncore names are something like: Cbo, iMC, >>> QPI. >> >> No they're not, they're C-Box etc.. but I'm fine with doing a tolower on >> all of it. >> > > The reason I choose CBox instead of C-Box is that '-' is a separate symbol > in the flex rules. '-' is used for matching events such as LLC-load-misses. > I don't know how to allow letter '-' in the pmu name, but without leading > to ambiguity. > I would drop the -, just call it cbox.
| |