Messages in this thread Patch in this message | | | From | Yong Zhang <> | Subject | [PATCH 08/10] SPARC: smp: remove call to ipi_call_lock_irq()/ipi_call_unlock_irq() | Date | Tue, 29 May 2012 15:16:03 +0800 |
| |
From: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang@windriver.com>
1) call_function.lock used in smp_call_function_many() is just to protect call_function.queue and &data->refs, cpu_online_mask is outside of the lock. And it's not necessary to protect cpu_online_mask, because data->cpumask is pre-calculate and even if a cpu is brougt up when calling arch_send_call_function_ipi_mask(), it's harmless because validation test in generic_smp_call_function_interrupt() will take care of it.
2) For cpu down issue, stop_machine() will guarantee that no concurrent smp_call_fuction() is processing.
Signed-off-by: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@gmail.com> Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net> Cc: sparclinux@vger.kernel.org --- arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c | 6 ++---- 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c b/arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c index f591598..60e745c 100644 --- a/arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c +++ b/arch/sparc/kernel/smp_64.c @@ -124,9 +124,9 @@ void __cpuinit smp_callin(void) while (!cpumask_test_cpu(cpuid, &smp_commenced_mask)) rmb(); - ipi_call_lock_irq(); + local_irq_disable(); set_cpu_online(cpuid, true); - ipi_call_unlock_irq(); + local_irq_enable(); /* idle thread is expected to have preempt disabled */ preempt_disable(); @@ -1308,9 +1308,7 @@ int __cpu_disable(void) mdelay(1); local_irq_disable(); - ipi_call_lock(); set_cpu_online(cpu, false); - ipi_call_unlock(); cpu_map_rebuild(); -- 1.7.5.4
| |