Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 23 May 2012 22:51:26 +0200 | Subject | Re: linux-next: Tree for May 23 (uml) | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> |
| |
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 8:19 PM, Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk> wrote: >> uml defconfig on x86_64: >> >> arch/um/kernel/process.c: In function 'interrupt_end': >> arch/um/kernel/process.c:122:14: error: 'struct task_struct' has no member named 'replacement_session_keyring' >> arch/um/kernel/process.c:123:4: error: implicit declaration of function 'key_replace_session_keyring' > > Grr... That's a conflict between uml gaining TIF_NOTIFY_RESUME (needed > prereq to task_work_add() series) and patch in said series doing away > with explicit calls of key_replace_session_keyring(). Fixup is to remove > those two lines in arch/um/process.c, same as done on other architectures > by "keys: kill the dummy key_replace_session_keyring()" (commit c1cb001).
JFYI, also on m68k:
http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/6353103/
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |