Messages in this thread | | | Date | Mon, 9 Apr 2012 17:47:55 -0500 | Subject | Re: [PATCH v17 15/15] Documentation: prctl/seccomp_filter | From | Will Drewry <> |
| |
On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 3:58 PM, Ryan Ware <ware@linux.intel.com> wrote: > > On 4/9/12 1:47 PM, "Markus Gutschke" <markus@chromium.org> wrote: > >>No matter what you do, please leave the samples accessible somewhere. >>They proved incredibly useful in figuring out how the API works. I am >>sure, other developers are going to appreciate them as well. >> >>Alternatively, if you don't want to include the samples with the >>kernel sources, figure out how you can include a sample in the >>official manual page for prctl(). >> > > I second this! They are extremely useful. > > Ryan
In that case, would it make sense to put up a separate tools/testing patch and leave samples where they lie? (I'd _love_ to keep this patch series from acquiring another 1000 lines, but either way works :)
My current tester and harness lives here: https://github.com/redpig/seccomp/blob/master/tests/ and the licensing can be sorted out prior to a patch mail.
thanks! will -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |