lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [6]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: Point-to-point bus in device tree
On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 01:08:29PM -0700, David Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2012 at 01:23:46PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:
> > On 04/05/2012 12:15 PM, David Brown wrote:
> > > Some MSM SoCs have a small serial-type "bus" that is used to
> > > communicate with the PMIC devices. This interface is always
> > > point-to-point. I'm doing a device-tree conversion of the driver that
> > > Ken Heitke posted last year <https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/2/17/503>.
> > >
> > > A naive conversion to device tree, would result in something like
> > > this:
> > >
> > > qcom,ssbi@500000 {
> > > compatible = "qcom,ssbi";
> > > reg = <0x500000 0x1000>;
> > > qcom,controller-type = "ssbi";
> > >
> > > qcom,pmic8058@0 {
> > > reg = <0x0 0x01>;
> > > ...
> > > }
> > > }
> > >
> > > There would end up being an extraneous register for the device on the
> > > other end (there are no addresses), and there would need to be code in
> > > the ssbi driver to traverse this small tree to find these nodes.
> >
> > Isn't that extra code simply:
> >
> > of_platform_populate(pdev->dev.of_node, NULL, NULL, &pdev->dev);
> >
> > That seems like pretty low overhead.
>
> True, but it still bothers me to have to have a bogus register.

Ok, not sure where I got that idea, but I don't appear to actually
need a register in the pmic8058 node for of_platform_populate to
create a platform device. It only needs a compatible field. So, it
look like that matches just what I need.

Thanks,
David

--
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-06 17:19    [W:0.036 / U:0.208 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site