Messages in this thread | | | Date | Thu, 5 Apr 2012 19:18:38 +0200 | From | Ingo Molnar <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH] printk: support structured and multi-facility log messages |
| |
* Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 17:05, Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote: > > * Kay Sievers <kay@vrfy.org> wrote: > > >> - Record-based stream instead of the traditional byte stream > >> buffer. All records carry a 64 bit timestamp, the syslog facility > >> and priority in the record header. > > > Hm, this seems to be a conceptual duplication of the console > > tracepoint that include/trace/events/printk.h already offers. > > General purpose kernel logging should not depend on _optional_ > facilities mainly intended for debugging and profiling. This > is stuff that should be used on every box out there, very much > much unlike tracing.
Firstly, you modify printk() and make it less simple and break its ASCII oriented nature - which is my primary objection: if you want to emit binary data then use existing binary logging facilities.
If you want to extend the ASCII output then work in the ASCII, human readable space and improve it.
If you want binary record logging (I'm not convinced printk() should do that, btw. - we are keeping it ASCII for damn good reasons), use perf software events - check your kernel, those are enabled more widely than even CONFIG_PRINTK is enabled - so your whole "but I don't want to rely on a non-generic facility" objection is bogus: perf events, if you decide to use them, are as generic as it gets.
So unless you have better justification for it than what you listed so far, or unless you have a better implementation that either goes into the better binary logging or into the better ASCII logging direction:
NAcked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
Because this one is neither.
Thanks,
Ingo -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |