lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [4]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 2/2] IPC: message queue stealing feature introduced
On Wed, 15 Feb 2012 20:54:39 +0400
Stanislav Kinsbursky <skinsbursky@parallels.com> wrote:

> v2:
> 1) compat functions added.
> 2) message slot size in array is now aligned by struct msgbuf_a.
> 3) check for enough free space in buffer before message copying added.
> 4) if MSG_STEAL flag is set, then do_msgrcv() returns number of bytes written
> to buffer.
> 5) flag MSG_NOERROR is ignored if MSG_STEAL flag is set.
>
> This patch is required for checkpoint/restore in userspace.
> IOW, c/r requires some way to get all pending IPC messages without deleting
> them for the queue (checkpoint can fail and in this case tasks will be resumed,
> so queue have to be valid).
> To achive this, new operation flag MSG_STEAL for sys_msgrcv() system call
> introduced.
> If this flag is set, then passed struct msgbuf pointer will be used for storing
> array of structures:
>
> struct msgbuf_a {
> long mtype; /* type of message */
> int msize; /* size of message */
> char mtext[0]; /* message text */
> };
>
> each of which will be followed by corresponding message data.
>

I'd be a bit more comfortable if there was some sign that other c/r
developers have reviewed and tested this and have successfully used it
in c/r operation testing?

We've been trying to isolate the c/r-specific functions inside #ifdef
CONFIG_CHECKPOINT_RESTORE, but this patch doesn't do that. I have been
encouraging this isolation so that people who aren't using c/r don't
have to carry the overhead it adds and so that we can more easily hunt
down and remove everything if the entire c/r project doesn't work out
successfully.

This patch modifies the sys_msgrcv() API and so we should update the
manpage for that syscall. Please work with Michael on this.

What does all the compat fiddling actually do? I guess it's needed for
checkpoint and restore of 32-bit userspace on 64-bit kernels? Does c/r
as a whole support that? It should. How well tested is this?



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-05 01:15    [W:0.076 / U:0.440 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site