lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [30]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH NEXT]staging: rtl8192u Fix typos.
On 04/30/2012 01:41 PM, Jesper Juhl wrote:
> On Mon, 30 Apr 2012, Justin P. Mattock wrote:
>
>> From: "Justin P. Mattock"<justinmattock@gmail.com>
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Justin P. Mattock<justinmattock@gmail.com>
>>
>> ---
>>
>> The below patch fixes some typos that I found while going through staging/rtl8192u
>>
>
> I think it needs a little more work - see below.
>
>
>> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c | 2 +-
>> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U.h | 6 +-
>> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c | 56 ++++++++++++++--------------
>> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c | 50 ++++++++++++------------
>> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.c | 8 ++--
>> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_HTType.h | 2 +-
>> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_cmdpkt.c | 8 ++--
>> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_firmware.c | 4 +-
>> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c | 16 ++++----
>> drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phyreg.h | 2 +-
>> 13 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c
>> index 8878cfe..0e8ff75 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.c
>> @@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
>>
>> Parts of this driver are based on the Intel Pro Wireless 2100 GPL driver.
>>
>> - We want to tanks the Authors of those projects and the Ndiswrapper
>> + We want to thanks the Authors of those projects and the Ndiswrapper
>> project Authors.
>
> I believe this would be better like this:
>
> We want to thank the authors of those projects and the Ndiswrapper
> project authors.
>
>
>> */
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.h
>> index fb3ac97..3527d32 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.h
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8180_93cx6.h
>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>> Parts of this driver are based on the rtl8180 driver skeleton from Patric Schenke& Andres Salomon
>> Parts of this driver are based on the Intel Pro Wireless 2100 GPL driver
>>
>> - We want to tanks the Authors of such projects and the Ndiswrapper project Authors.
>> + We want to thanks the Authors of such projects and the Ndiswrapper project Authors.
>
> Same comment as above "We want to thank .." rather than "We want to
> thanks ..". And "authors" rather than "Authors".
>
>
>> */
>>
>> /*This files contains card eeprom (93c46 or 93c56) programming routines*/
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U.h
>> index 43d459d..adeb724 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U.h
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U.h
>> @@ -11,7 +11,7 @@
>>
>> Parts of this driver are based on the Intel Pro Wireless 2100 GPL driver
>>
>> - We want to tanks the Authors of those projects and the Ndiswrapper
>> + We want to thanks the Authors of those projects and the Ndiswrapper
>> project Authors.
>
> Same comment as above.
>
>
>> */
>>
>> @@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ do { if(rt_global_debug_component& component) \
>> #define COMP_INIT BIT2 // during driver initialization / halt / reset.
>>
>>
>> -#define COMP_RECV BIT3 // Reveive part data path.
>> +#define COMP_RECV BIT3 // Revive part data path.
>
> Are you sure that "Receive data path." is not what was intended here?
>
>
>> #define COMP_SEND BIT4 // Send part path.
>> #define COMP_IO BIT5 // I/O Related. Added by Annie, 2006-03-02.
>> #define COMP_POWER BIT6 // 802.11 Power Save mode or System/Device Power state related.
>> @@ -322,7 +322,7 @@ typedef struct _tx_fwinfo_819x_usb {
>> u8 TxSubCarrier:2; // This is used for legacy OFDM rate only.
>> u8 STBC:2;
>> u8 AllowAggregation:1;
>> - u8 RtsHT:1; //Interpre RtsRate field as high throughput data rate
>> + u8 RtsHT:1; //Interprete RtsRate field as high throughput data rate
>
> I believe this should be "Interpret RtsRate field as high throughput data rate".
>
>
>> u8 RtsShort:1; //Short PLCP for CCK, or short GI for 11n MCS
>> u8 RtsBandwidth:1; // This is used for HT MCS rate only.
>> u8 RtsSubcarrier:2; // This is used for legacy OFDM rate only.
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
>> index 9c00865..be86045 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_core.c
>> @@ -203,7 +203,7 @@ static void rtl819x_set_channel_map(u8 channel_plan, struct r8192_priv* priv)
>> {
>> Dot11d_Init(ieee);
>> ieee->bGlobalDomain = false;
>> - //acturally 8225& 8256 rf chip only support B,G,24N mode
>> + //actually 8225& 8256 rf chip only support B,G,24N mode
>
> "chip" is singular, but here there are two of them (8225& 8256) so I
> believe you should use the plural "chips".
>
>
>> if ((priv->rf_chip == RF_8225) || (priv->rf_chip == RF_8256))
>> {
>> min_chan = 1;
>> @@ -1103,7 +1103,7 @@ inline u16 rtl8192_rate2rate(short rate)
>> }
>>
>>
>> -/* The protype of rx_isr has changed since one verion of Linux Kernel */
>> +/* The prototype of rx_isr has changed since one version of Linux Kernel */
>
> Can't argue with the correction of the spelling of "prototype" but, while
> you are at it, why not fix the entire sentence? "has changed since one
> version of the Linux kernel" - what does that really mean? If you don't
> know either then I'm fine with just leaving it to the spelling fix :-)
>
>
>> static void rtl8192_rx_isr(struct urb *urb)
>> {
>> struct sk_buff *skb = (struct sk_buff *) urb->context;
>> @@ -1476,7 +1476,7 @@ static void rtl8192_tx_isr(struct urb *tx_urb)
>> if(tcb_desc->queue_index != TXCMD_QUEUE) {
>> if(tx_urb->status == 0) {
>> dev->trans_start = jiffies;
>> - // As act as station mode, destion shall be unicast address.
>> + // As act as station mode, destination shall be unicast address.
>
> Perhaps "// Act as station mode, destination shall ..." ?
>
>
>> //priv->ieee80211->stats.tx_bytes+=(skb->len - priv->ieee80211->tx_headroom);
>> //priv->ieee80211->stats.tx_packets++;
>> priv->stats.txoktotal++;
>> @@ -1522,13 +1522,13 @@ static void rtl8192_tx_isr(struct urb *tx_urb)
>> else if ((skb_queue_len(&priv->ieee80211->skb_drv_aggQ[queue_index])!= 0)&&\
>> (!(priv->ieee80211->queue_stop))) {
>> // Tx Driver Aggregation process
>> - /* The driver will aggregation the packets according to the following stets
>> + /* The driver will aggregation the packets according to the following stats
>> * 1. check whether there's tx irq available, for it's a completion return
>> * function, it should contain enough tx irq;
>> - * 2. check pakcet type;
>> + * 2. check packet type;
>> * 3. initialize sendlist, check whether the to-be send packet no greater than 1
>> - * 4. aggregation the packets, and fill firmware info and tx desc to it, etc.
>> - * 5. check whehter the packet could be sent, otherwise just insert to wait head
>> + * 4. aggregates the packets, and fill firmware info and tx desc to it, etc.
>
> "... and fill firmware info and tx desc into it ..." perhaps?
>
>> + * 5. check whether the packet could be sent, otherwise just insert to wait head
>
> "... insert into wait head" perhaps?
>
>
>> * */
>> skb = skb_dequeue(&priv->ieee80211->skb_drv_aggQ[queue_index]);
>> if(!check_nic_enough_desc(dev, queue_index)) {
>> @@ -2447,7 +2447,7 @@ static int rtl8192_qos_handle_probe_response(struct r8192_priv *priv,
>> return 0;
>> }
>>
>> -/* handle manage frame frame beacon and probe response */
>> +/* handle and manage frame from beacon and probe response */
>> static int rtl8192_handle_beacon(struct net_device * dev,
>> struct ieee80211_beacon * beacon,
>> struct ieee80211_network * network)
>> @@ -2625,7 +2625,7 @@ bool GetHalfNmodeSupportByAPs819xUsb(struct net_device* dev)
>> void rtl8192_refresh_supportrate(struct r8192_priv* priv)
>> {
>> struct ieee80211_device* ieee = priv->ieee80211;
>> - //we donot consider set support rate for ABG mode, only HT MCS rate is set here.
>> + //we do not consider set support rate for ABG mode, only HT MCS rate is set here.
>> if (ieee->mode == WIRELESS_MODE_N_24G || ieee->mode == WIRELESS_MODE_N_5G)
>> {
>> memcpy(ieee->Regdot11HTOperationalRateSet, ieee->RegHTSuppRateSet, 16);
>> @@ -2780,10 +2780,10 @@ static void rtl8192_init_priv_variable(struct net_device* dev)
>> priv->TransmitConfig =
>> // TCR_DurProcMode | //for RTL8185B, duration setting by HW
>> //? TCR_DISReqQsize |
>> - (TCR_MXDMA_2048<<TCR_MXDMA_OFFSET)| // Max DMA Burst Size per Tx DMA Burst, 7: reservied.
>> + (TCR_MXDMA_2048<<TCR_MXDMA_OFFSET)| // Max DMA Burst Size per Tx DMA Burst, 7: reserved.
>> (priv->ShortRetryLimit<<TCR_SRL_OFFSET)| // Short retry limit
>> (priv->LongRetryLimit<<TCR_LRL_OFFSET) | // Long retry limit
>> - (false ? TCR_SAT: 0); // FALSE: HW provies PLCP length and LENGEXT, TURE: SW proiveds them
>> + (false ? TCR_SAT: 0); // FALSE: HW provides PLCP length and LENGEXT, TURE: SW provides them
>
> I believe "TURE" wants to be changed to "TRUE".
>
>
>> #ifdef TO_DO_LIST
>> if(Adapter->bInHctTest)
>> pHalData->ReceiveConfig = pHalData->CSMethod |
>> @@ -3437,7 +3437,7 @@ if(Adapter->ResetProgress == RESET_TYPE_NORESET)
>> { // User disable RF via registry.
>> RT_TRACE((COMP_INIT|COMP_RF), DBG_LOUD, ("InitializeAdapter819xUsb(): Turn off RF for RegRfOff ----------\n"));
>> MgntActSet_RF_State(Adapter, eRfOff, RF_CHANGE_BY_SW);
>> - // Those action will be discard in MgntActSet_RF_State because off the same state
>> + // Those action will be discard in MgntActSet_RF_State because of the same state
>
> Shouldn't this be "Those actions" (plural) rather than "Those action" ?
>
>
>> for(eRFPath = 0; eRFPath<pHalData->NumTotalRFPath; eRFPath++)
>> PHY_SetRFReg(Adapter, (RF90_RADIO_PATH_E)eRFPath, 0x4, 0xC00, 0x0);
>> }
>> @@ -3458,7 +3458,7 @@ if(Adapter->ResetProgress == RESET_TYPE_NORESET)
>> if(pHalData->eRFPowerState == eRfOff)
>> {
>> MgntActSet_RF_State(Adapter, eRfOff, pMgntInfo->RfOffReason);
>> - // Those action will be discard in MgntActSet_RF_State because off the same state
>> + // Those action will be discard in MgntActSet_RF_State because of the same state
>
> Same comment as above.
>
>
>> for(eRFPath = 0; eRFPath<pHalData->NumTotalRFPath; eRFPath++)
>> PHY_SetRFReg(Adapter, (RF90_RADIO_PATH_E)eRFPath, 0x4, 0xC00, 0x0);
>> }
>> @@ -3586,7 +3586,7 @@ TxCheckStuck(struct net_device *dev)
>> //unsigned long flags;
>>
>> //
>> - // Decide Stuch threshold according to current power save mode
>> + // Decide such threshold according to current power save mode
>> //
>>
>> // RT_TRACE(COMP_RESET, " ==> TxCheckStuck()\n");
>> @@ -3745,7 +3745,7 @@ rtl819x_ifcheck_resetornot(struct net_device *dev)
>>
>> // Driver should not check RX stuck in IBSS mode because it is required to
>> // set Check BSSID in order to send beacon, however, if check BSSID is
>> - // set, STA cannot hear any packet a all. Emily, 2008.04.12
>> + // set, STA cannot hear any packet at all. Emily, 2008.04.12
>> RxResetType = RxCheckStuck(dev);
>> }
>> if(TxResetType==RESET_TYPE_NORMAL || RxResetType==RESET_TYPE_NORMAL)
>> @@ -3962,7 +3962,7 @@ RESET_START:
>> up(&priv->wx_sem);
>> RT_TRACE(COMP_RESET,"%s():<==========down process is finished\n",__FUNCTION__);
>> //rtl8192_irq_disable(dev);
>> - RT_TRACE(COMP_RESET,"%s():===========>start to up the driver\n",__FUNCTION__);
>> + RT_TRACE(COMP_RESET,"%s():===========>start up the driver\n",__FUNCTION__);
>> reset_status = _rtl8192_up(dev);
>>
>> RT_TRACE(COMP_RESET,"%s():<===========up process is finished\n",__FUNCTION__);
>> @@ -4155,7 +4155,7 @@ extern void rtl819x_watchdog_wqcallback(struct work_struct *work)
>> void watch_dog_timer_callback(unsigned long data)
>> {
>> struct r8192_priv *priv = ieee80211_priv((struct net_device *) data);
>> - //printk("===============>watch_dog timer\n");
>> + //printk("===============>watch_dog timer\n");
>> queue_delayed_work(priv->priv_wq,&priv->watch_dog_wq, 0);
>> mod_timer(&priv->watch_dog_timer, jiffies + MSECS(IEEE80211_WATCH_DOG_TIME));
>> }
>> @@ -4170,7 +4170,7 @@ int _rtl8192_up(struct net_device *dev)
>> init_status = rtl8192_adapter_start(dev);
>> if(!init_status)
>> {
>> - RT_TRACE(COMP_ERR,"ERR!!! %s(): initialization is failed!\n", __FUNCTION__);
>> + RT_TRACE(COMP_ERR,"ERR!!! %s(): initialization failed!\n", __FUNCTION__);
>> priv->up=priv->ieee80211->ieee_up = 0;
>> return -EAGAIN;
>> }
>> @@ -4256,7 +4256,7 @@ int rtl8192_down(struct net_device *dev)
>> skb_queue_purge(&priv->ieee80211->skb_drv_aggQ [i]);
>> }
>>
>> - //as cancel_delayed_work will del work->timer, so if work is not definedas struct delayed_work, it will corrupt
>> + //as cancel_delayed_work will del work->timer, so if work is not defined as struct delayed_work, it will corrupt
>> // flush_scheduled_work();
>> rtl8192_cancel_deferred_work(priv);
>> deinit_hal_dm(dev);
>> @@ -4516,7 +4516,7 @@ u8 HwRateToMRate90(bool bIsHT, u8 rate)
>>
>> /**
>> * Function: UpdateRxPktTimeStamp
>> - * Overview: Recored down the TSF time stamp when receiving a packet
>> + * Overview: Record down the TSF time stamp when receiving a packet
>
> Why not just "Record the TSF time stamp ..." ?
>
>
>> *
>> * Input:
>> * PADAPTER Adapter
>> @@ -4556,9 +4556,9 @@ long rtl819x_translate_todbm(u8 signal_strength_index )// 0-100 index.
>> }
>>
>>
>> -/* 2008/01/22 MH We can not delcare RSSI/EVM total value of sliding window to
>> +/* 2008/01/22 MH We can not declare RSSI/EVM total value of sliding window to
>> be a local static. Otherwise, it may increase when we return from S3/S4. The
>> - value will be kept in memory or disk. We must delcare the value in adapter
>> + value will be kept in memory or disk. We must declare the value in adapter
>
> Shouldn't it be "declare the value in the ...".
>
> And shouldn't it be "adaptor" rather than "adapter"? Since an "adaptor" is
> a device and "adapter" is a person who's able to adapt.
>
>
>> and it will be reinitialized when return from S3/S4. */
>> void rtl8192_process_phyinfo(struct r8192_priv * priv,u8* buffer, struct ieee80211_rx_stats * pprevious_stats, struct ieee80211_rx_stats * pcurrent_stats)
>> {
>> @@ -5091,7 +5091,7 @@ static void rtl8192_query_rxphystatus(
>> tmp_rxevm = pofdm_buf->rxevm_X[i];
>> rx_evmX = (char)(tmp_rxevm);
>>
>> - // Do not use shift operation like "rx_evmX>>= 1" because the compilor of free build environment
>> + // Do not use shift operation like "rx_evmX>>= 1" because the compiler of free build environment
>> // fill most significant bit to "zero" when doing shifting operation which may change a negative
>
> "fill most significant bit to "zero" when doing..." sounds a bit broken to
> me (but I could be wrong). I would have corrected this to "will set the
> most significant bit to "zero" when doing ..."
> Better or??
>
>
>> // value to positive one, then the dbm value (which is supposed to be negative) is not correct anymore.
>> rx_evmX /= 2; //dbm
>> @@ -5171,7 +5171,7 @@ void TranslateRxSignalStuff819xUsb(struct sk_buff *skb,
>> type = WLAN_FC_GET_TYPE(fc);
>> praddr = hdr->addr1;
>>
>> - /* Check if the received packet is acceptabe. */
>> + /* Check if the received packet is acceptable. */
>> bpacket_match_bssid = ((IEEE80211_FTYPE_CTL != type)&&
>> (eqMacAddr(priv->ieee80211->current_network.bssid, (fc& IEEE80211_FCTL_TODS)? hdr->addr1 : (fc& IEEE80211_FCTL_FROMDS )? hdr->addr2 : hdr->addr3))
>> && (!pstats->bHwError)&& (!pstats->bCRC)&& (!pstats->bICV));
>> @@ -5211,7 +5211,7 @@ void TranslateRxSignalStuff819xUsb(struct sk_buff *skb,
>>
>> /**
>> * Function: UpdateReceivedRateHistogramStatistics
>> -* Overview: Recored down the received data rate
>> +* Overview: Record down the received data rate
>
> What about just "Record the received data rate".
>
>
>> *
>> * Input:
>> * struct net_device *dev
>> @@ -5401,7 +5401,7 @@ void query_rxdesc_status(struct sk_buff *skb, struct ieee80211_rx_stats *stats,
>> }
>>
>> #ifdef USB_RX_AGGREGATION_SUPPORT
>> - /* for the rx aggregated sub frame, the redundant space truelly contained in the packet */
>> + /* for the rx aggregated sub frame, the redundant space truly contained in the packet */
>> if(bIsRxAggrSubframe) {
>> skb_pull(skb, 8);
>> }
>> @@ -5480,7 +5480,7 @@ void rtl8192_rx_nomal(struct sk_buff* skb)
>> PacketShiftBytes = GetRxPacketShiftBytes819xUsb(&stats, false);
>> }
>> #endif
>> - /* Process the MPDU recevied */
>> + /* Process the MPDU received */
>> skb_trim(skb, skb->len - 4/*sCrcLng*/);
>>
>> rx_pkt_len = skb->len;
>> @@ -5538,7 +5538,7 @@ void rtl8192_rx_nomal(struct sk_buff* skb)
>> if(PacketLength> agg_skb->len) {
>> break;
>> }
>> - /* Process the MPDU recevied */
>> + /* Process the MPDU received */
>> skb = dev_alloc_skb(PacketLength);
>> memcpy(skb_put(skb,PacketLength),agg_skb->data, PacketLength);
>> skb_trim(skb, skb->len - 4/*sCrcLng*/);
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c
>> index 2dde9fa..3f79e61 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_dm.c
>> @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ static u32 edca_setting_UL[HT_IOT_PEER_MAX] =
>> /*------------------------Define global variable-----------------------------*/
>> // Debug variable ?
>> dig_t dm_digtable;
>> -// Store current shoftware write register content for MAC PHY.
>> +// Store current software write register content for MAC PHY.
>> u8 dm_shadow[16][256] = {{0}};
>> // For Dynamic Rx Path Selection by Signal Strength
>> DRxPathSel DM_RxPathSelTable;
>> @@ -119,7 +119,7 @@ static void dm_pd_th(struct net_device *dev);
>> static void dm_cs_ratio(struct net_device *dev);
>>
>> static void dm_init_ctstoself(struct net_device *dev);
>> -// DM --> EDCA turboe mode control
>> +// DM --> EDCA turbo mode control
>> static void dm_check_edca_turbo(struct net_device *dev);
>>
>> // DM --> HW RF control
>> @@ -348,7 +348,7 @@ extern void init_rate_adaptive(struct net_device * dev)
>> *
>> * Revised History:
>> * When Who Remark
>> - * 05/26/08 amy Create version 0 proting from windows code.
>> + * 05/26/08 amy Create version 0 porting from windows code.
>> *
>> *---------------------------------------------------------------------------*/
>> static void dm_check_rate_adaptive(struct net_device * dev)
>> @@ -543,7 +543,7 @@ static u32 OFDMSwingTable[OFDM_Table_Length] = {
>> 0x5a400169, // 3, +3db
>> 0x50800142, // 4, +2db
>> 0x47c0011f, // 5, +1db
>> - 0x40000100, // 6, +0db ===> default, upper for higher temprature, lower for low temprature
>> + 0x40000100, // 6, +0db ===> default, upper for higher temperature, lower for low temperature
>> 0x390000e4, // 7, -1db
>> 0x32c000cb, // 8, -2db
>> 0x2d4000b5, // 9, -3db
>> @@ -678,7 +678,7 @@ static void dm_TXPowerTrackingCallback_TSSI(struct net_device * dev)
>> {
>> write_nic_byte(dev, 0x1ba, 0);
>> viviflag = FALSE;
>> - RT_TRACE(COMP_POWER_TRACKING, "we filted this data\n");
>> + RT_TRACE(COMP_POWER_TRACKING, "we filtered the data\n");
>> for(k = 0;k< 5; k++)
>> tmp_report[k] = 0;
>> break;
>> @@ -864,14 +864,14 @@ static void dm_TXPowerTrackingCallback_ThermalMeter(struct net_device * dev)
>> RT_TRACE(COMP_POWER_TRACKING, "Readback ThermalMeterA = %d \n", tmpRegA);
>> if(tmpRegA< 3 || tmpRegA> 13)
>> return;
>> - if(tmpRegA>= 12) // if over 12, TP will be bad when high temprature
>> + if(tmpRegA>= 12) // if over 12, TP will be bad when high temperature
>> tmpRegA = 12;
>> RT_TRACE(COMP_POWER_TRACKING, "Valid ThermalMeterA = %d \n", tmpRegA);
>> priv->ThermalMeter[0] = ThermalMeterVal; //We use fixed value by Bryant's suggestion
>> priv->ThermalMeter[1] = ThermalMeterVal; //We use fixed value by Bryant's suggestion
>>
>> - //Get current RF-A temprature index
>> - if(priv->ThermalMeter[0]>= (u8)tmpRegA) //lower temprature
>> + //Get current RF-A temperature index
>> + if(priv->ThermalMeter[0]>= (u8)tmpRegA) //lower temperature
>> {
>> tmpOFDMindex = tmpCCK20Mindex = 6+(priv->ThermalMeter[0]-(u8)tmpRegA);
>> tmpCCK40Mindex = tmpCCK20Mindex - 6;
>> @@ -885,7 +885,7 @@ static void dm_TXPowerTrackingCallback_ThermalMeter(struct net_device * dev)
>> else
>> {
>> tmpval = ((u8)tmpRegA - priv->ThermalMeter[0]);
>> - if(tmpval>= 6) // higher temprature
>> + if(tmpval>= 6) // higher temperature
>> tmpOFDMindex = tmpCCK20Mindex = 0; // max to +6dB
>> else
>> tmpOFDMindex = tmpCCK20Mindex = 6 - tmpval;
>> @@ -1457,9 +1457,9 @@ static void dm_InitializeTXPowerTracking_ThermalMeter(struct net_device *dev)
>> {
>> struct r8192_priv *priv = ieee80211_priv(dev);
>>
>> - // Tx Power tracking by Theremal Meter require Firmware R/W 3-wire. This mechanism
>> + // Tx Power tracking by Thermal Meter require Firmware R/W 3-wire. This mechanism
>
> Shouldn't this be "requires" rather than "require" ?
> No argument about the Theremal-->Thermal change :)
>
>
>> // can be enabled only when Firmware R/W 3-wire is enabled. Otherwise, frequent r/w
>> - // 3-wire by driver cause RF goes into wrong state.
>> + // 3-wire by driver causes RF to go into a wrong state.
>> if(priv->ieee80211->FwRWRF)
>> priv->btxpower_tracking = TRUE;
>> else
>> @@ -1520,7 +1520,7 @@ static void dm_CheckTXPowerTracking_ThermalMeter(struct net_device *dev)
>>
>> if(!TM_Trigger)
>> {
>> - //Attention!! You have to wirte all 12bits data to RF, or it may cause RF to crash
>> + //Attention!! You have to write all 12bits data to RF, or it may cause RF to crash
>
> How about "... all 12 bits of data ..." ?
>
>
>> //actually write reg0x02 bit1=0, then bit1=1.
>> //DbgPrint("Trigger ThermalMeter, write RF reg0x2 = 0x4d to 0x4f\n");
>> rtl8192_phy_SetRFReg(dev, RF90_PATH_A, 0x02, bMask12Bits, 0x4d);
>> @@ -1744,7 +1744,7 @@ extern void dm_restore_dynamic_mechanism_state(struct net_device *dev)
>> write_nic_dword(dev, RATR0, ratr_value);
>> write_nic_byte(dev, UFWP, 1);
>> }
>> - //Resore TX Power Tracking Index
>> + //Restore TX Power Tracking Index
>> if(priv->btxpower_trackingInit&& priv->btxpower_tracking){
>> dm_txpower_reset_recovery(dev);
>> }
>> @@ -2031,7 +2031,7 @@ static void dm_dig_init(struct net_device *dev)
>> dm_digtable.dbg_mode = DM_DBG_OFF; //off=by real rssi value, on=by DM_DigTable.Rssi_val for new dig
>> dm_digtable.dig_algorithm_switch = 0;
>>
>> - /* 2007/10/04 MH Define init gain threshol. */
>> + /* 2007/10/04 MH Define init gain threshold. */
>> dm_digtable.dig_state = DM_STA_DIG_MAX;
>> dm_digtable.dig_highpwr_state = DM_STA_DIG_MAX;
>> dm_digtable.initialgain_lowerbound_state = false;
>> @@ -2097,7 +2097,7 @@ static void dm_ctrl_initgain_byrssi_by_driverrssi(
>> return;
>>
>> //DbgPrint("Dig by Sw Rssi \n");
>> - if(dm_digtable.dig_algorithm_switch) // if swithed algorithm, we have to disable FW Dig.
>> + if(dm_digtable.dig_algorithm_switch) // if switched algorithm, we have to disable FW Dig.
>> fw_dig = 0;
>> if(fw_dig<= 3) // execute several times to make sure the FW Dig is disabled
>> {// FW DIG Off
>> @@ -2160,7 +2160,7 @@ static void dm_ctrl_initgain_byrssi_by_fwfalse_alarm(
>> /*DbgPrint("DIG Check\n\r RSSI=%d LOW=%d HIGH=%d STATE=%d",
>> pHalData->UndecoratedSmoothedPWDB, DM_DigTable.RssiLowThresh,
>> DM_DigTable.RssiHighThresh, DM_DigTable.Dig_State);*/
>> - /* 1. When RSSI decrease, We have to judge if it is smaller than a treshold
>> + /* 1. When RSSI decrease, We have to judge if it is smaller than a threshold
>> and then execute below step. */
>> if ((priv->undecorated_smoothed_pwdb<= dm_digtable.rssi_low_thresh))
>> {
>> @@ -2220,7 +2220,7 @@ static void dm_ctrl_initgain_byrssi_by_fwfalse_alarm(
>>
>> }
>>
>> - /* 2. When RSSI increase, We have to judge if it is larger than a treshold
>> + /* 2. When RSSI increase, We have to judge if it is larger than a threshold
>> and then execute below step. */
>> if ((priv->undecorated_smoothed_pwdb>= dm_digtable.rssi_high_thresh) )
>> {
>> @@ -2329,7 +2329,7 @@ static void dm_ctrl_initgain_byrssi_highpwr(
>> }
>>
>> /* 3. When RSSI>75% or<70%, it is a high power issue. We have to judge if
>> - it is larger than a treshold and then execute below step. */
>> + it is larger than a threshold and then execute below step. */
>
> "the step below" rather than "below step"? (also seen above).
>
>
>> // 2008/02/05 MH SD3-Jerry Modify PD_TH for high power issue.
>> if (priv->undecorated_smoothed_pwdb>= dm_digtable.rssi_high_power_highthresh)
>> {
>> @@ -2841,8 +2841,8 @@ static void dm_check_rfctrl_gpio(struct net_device * dev)
>> {
>> //struct r8192_priv *priv = ieee80211_priv(dev);
>>
>> - // Walk around for DTM test, we will not enable HW - radio on/off because r/w
>> - // page 1 register before Lextra bus is enabled cause system fails when resuming
>> + // Work around for DTM test, we will not enable HW - radio on/off because r/w
>> + // page 1 register before extra bus is enabled causing system fails when resuming
>
> "system failure" or "system failures" rather than "system fails" perhaps?
>
>
>
>> // from S4. 20080218, Emily
>>
>> // Stop to execute workitem to prevent S3/S4 bug.
>> @@ -3377,13 +3377,13 @@ extern void dm_fsync_timer_callback(unsigned long data)
>> {
>>
>> u32 DiffNum = priv->rateCountDiffRecord - rate_count_diff;
>> - // Contiune count
>> + // Continue count
>> if(DiffNum>= priv->ieee80211->fsync_seconddiff_ratethreshold)
>> priv->ContiuneDiffCount++;
>> else
>> priv->ContiuneDiffCount = 0;
>>
>> - // Contiune count over
>> + // Continue count over
>> if(priv->ContiuneDiffCount>=2)
>> {
>> bSwitchFromCountDiff = true;
>> @@ -3392,7 +3392,7 @@ extern void dm_fsync_timer_callback(unsigned long data)
>> }
>> else
>> {
>> - // Stop contiune count
>> + // Stop continue count
>
> "Stop counting" ?
>
>
>> priv->ContiuneDiffCount = 0;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -3523,7 +3523,7 @@ static void dm_StartSWFsync(struct net_device *dev)
>> RT_TRACE(COMP_HALDM,"%s\n", __FUNCTION__);
>> // Initial rate record to zero, start to record.
>> priv->rate_record = 0;
>> - // Initial contiune diff count to zero, start to record.
>> + // Initial continue diff count to zero, start to record.
>
> How about "// Initialize continue diff count to zero, start to record."
>
>> priv->ContiuneDiffCount = 0;
>
> "Continue" is misspelled in this variable name as well - that ought to
> also be fixed IMHO.
>
>
>> priv->rateCountDiffRecord = 0;
>> priv->bswitch_fsync = false;
>> @@ -3875,7 +3875,7 @@ static void dm_send_rssi_tofw(struct net_device *dev)
>>
>> // If we test chariot, we should stop the TX command ?
>> // Because 92E will always silent reset when we send tx command. We use register
>> - // 0x1e0(byte) to botify driver.
>> + // 0x1e0(byte) to notify driver.
>> write_nic_byte(dev, DRIVER_RSSI, (u8)priv->undecorated_smoothed_pwdb);
>> return;
>> tx_cmd.Op = TXCMD_SET_RX_RSSI;
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h
>> index e89aaf7..b0ee4dd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_hw.h
>> @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@
>> Parts of this driver are based on the Intel Pro Wireless
>> 2100 GPL driver.
>>
>> - We want to tanks the Authors of those projects
>> + We want to thanks the Authors of those projects
>
> "We want to thank the authors ..."
>
>
>> and the Ndiswrapper project Authors.
>> */
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.c
>> index 981de9b..2ce0fc8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.c
>> @@ -13,7 +13,7 @@
>>
>> Parts of this driver are based on the Intel Pro Wireless 2100 GPL driver.
>>
>> - We want to tanks the Authors of those projects and the Ndiswrapper
>> + We want to thanks the Authors of those projects and the Ndiswrapper
>> project Authors.
>
> Same comment as above.
>
>
>> */
>>
>> @@ -256,7 +256,7 @@ static int r8192_wx_get_ap_status(struct net_device *dev,
>> //count the length of input ssid
>> for(name_len=0 ; ((char*)wrqu->data.pointer)[name_len]!='\0' ; name_len++);
>>
>> - //search for the correspoding info which is received
>> + //search for the corresponding info which is received
>> list_for_each_entry(target,&ieee->network_list, list) {
>> if ( (target->ssid_len == name_len)&&
>> (strncmp(target->ssid, (char*)wrqu->data.pointer, name_len)==0)){
>> @@ -419,7 +419,7 @@ static int rtl8180_wx_get_range(struct net_device *dev,
>> range->max_qual.updated = 7; /* Updated all three */
>>
>> range->avg_qual.qual = 92; /*> 8% missed beacons is 'bad' */
>> - /* TODO: Find real 'good' to 'bad' threshol value for RSSI */
>> + /* TODO: Find real 'good' to 'bad' threshold value for RSSI */
>> range->avg_qual.level = 20 + -98;
>> range->avg_qual.noise = 0;
>> range->avg_qual.updated = 7; /* Updated all three */
>> @@ -1047,7 +1047,7 @@ static iw_handler r8192_wx_handlers[] =
>> #else
>> NULL,
>> #endif
>> - dummy, /* SIOCGIWAPLIST -- depricated */
>> + dummy, /* SIOCGIWAPLIST -- deprecated */
>> r8192_wx_set_scan, /* SIOCSIWSCAN */
>> r8192_wx_get_scan, /* SIOCGIWSCAN */
>> r8192_wx_set_essid, /* SIOCSIWESSID */
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.h
>> index f4cf280..1388664 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.h
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r8192U_wx.h
>> @@ -7,7 +7,7 @@
>> Parts of this driver are based on the rtl8180 driver skeleton from Patric Schenke& Andres Salomon
>> Parts of this driver are based on the Intel Pro Wireless 2100 GPL driver
>>
>> - We want to tanks the Authors of such projects and the Ndiswrapper project Authors.
>> + We want to thanks the Authors of such projects and the Ndiswrapper project Authors.
>
> Same comment here as the previous comment above.
>
>
>> */
>>
>> /* this file (will) contains wireless extension handlers*/
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_HTType.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_HTType.h
>> index 2ac4216..e07f8b1 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_HTType.h
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_HTType.h
>> @@ -211,7 +211,7 @@ typedef struct _RT_HIGH_THROUGHPUT{
>> u8 bEnableHT;
>> u8 bCurrentHTSupport;
>>
>> - u8 bRegBW40MHz; // Tx 40MHz channel capablity
>> + u8 bRegBW40MHz; // Tx 40MHz channel capability
>> u8 bCurBW40MHz; // Tx 40MHz channel capability
>>
>> u8 bRegShortGI40MHz; // Tx Short GI for 40Mhz
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_cmdpkt.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_cmdpkt.c
>> index 9348f42..ec1eeb7 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_cmdpkt.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_cmdpkt.c
>> @@ -157,7 +157,7 @@ SendTxCommandPacket(
>> seg_ptr = skb_put(skb, buffer_len);
>> /*
>> * Transform from little endian to big endian
>> - * and pending zero
>> + * and pending zero
>> */
>> memcpy(seg_ptr,codevirtualaddress,buffer_len);
>> tcb_desc->txbuf_size= (u16)buffer_len;
>> @@ -718,15 +718,15 @@ cmpk_message_handle_rx(
>> /* 2. Read virtual address from RFD. */
>> pcmd_buff = pstats->virtual_address;
>>
>> - /* 3. Read command pakcet element id and length. */
>> + /* 3. Read command packet element id and length. */
>> element_id = pcmd_buff[0];
>> /*RT_TRACE(COMP_SEND, DebugLevel,
>> ("\n\r[CMPK]-->element ID=%d Len=%d", element_id, total_length));*/
>>
>> - /* 4. Check every received command packet conent according to different
>> + /* 4. Check every received command packet content according to different
>> element type. Because FW may aggregate RX command packet to minimize
>> transmit time between DRV and FW.*/
>> - // Add a counter to prevent to locked in the loop too long
>> + // Add a counter to prevent the lock in the loop to be to long
>
> Perhaps "... to prevent the lock in the loop to be held too long" would be
> better?
>
>
>> while (total_length> 0 || exe_cnt++>100)
>> {
>> /* 2007/01/17 MH We support aggregation of different cmd in the same packet. */
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_firmware.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_firmware.c
>> index 4bb5fff..fe5776d 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_firmware.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_firmware.c
>> @@ -275,11 +275,11 @@ bool init_firmware(struct net_device *dev)
>>
>> /*
>> * Download boot, main, and data image for System reset.
>> - * Download data image for firmware reseta
>> + * Download data image for firmware reset
>> */
>> for(init_step = starting_state; init_step<= FW_INIT_STEP2_DATA; init_step++) {
>> /*
>> - * Open Image file, and map file to contineous memory if open file success.
>> + * Open Image file, and map file to continuous memory if open file success.
>
> Why "Image" and not "image"?
>
>
>> * or read image file from array. Default load from IMG file
>> */
>> if(rst_opt == OPT_SYSTEM_RESET) {
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c
>> index c4586b0..636d6fd 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phy.c
>> @@ -40,7 +40,7 @@ static u32 RF_CHANNEL_TABLE_ZEBRA[] = {
>> * and do register read/write
>> * input: u32 dwBitMask //taget bit pos in the addr to be modified
>> * output: none
>> - * return: u32 return the shift bit bit position of the mask
>> + * return: u32 return the shift bit position of the mask
>> * ****************************************************************************/
>> u32 rtl8192_CalculateBitShift(u32 dwBitMask)
>> {
>> @@ -176,7 +176,7 @@ u32 rtl8192_phy_RFSerialRead(struct net_device* dev, RF90_RADIO_PATH_E eRFPath,
>> rtl8192_setBBreg(dev, pPhyReg->rfHSSIPara2, bLSSIReadEdge, 0x1);
>>
>>
>> - // TODO: we should not delay such a long time. Ask help from SD3
>> + // TODO: we should not delay such a long time. Ask help from SD3
>
> How about "Ask for help" rather than "Ask help" ?
>
>
>> msleep(1);
>>
>> ret = rtl8192_QueryBBReg(dev, pPhyReg->rfLSSIReadBack, bLSSIReadBackData);
>> @@ -252,7 +252,7 @@ void rtl8192_phy_RFSerialWrite(struct net_device* dev, RF90_RADIO_PATH_E eRFPath
>> NewOffset = Offset;
>> }
>>
>> - // Put write addr in [5:0] and write data in [31:16]
>> + // Put write addr in [5:0] and write data in [31:16]
>> DataAndAddr = (Data<<16) | (NewOffset&0x3f);
>>
>> // Write Operation
>> @@ -525,7 +525,7 @@ void rtl8192_phy_configmac(struct net_device* dev)
>> }
>>
>> /******************************************************************************
>> - *function: This function do dirty work
>> + *function: This function does dirty work
>> * input: dev
>> * output: none
>> * return: none
>> @@ -578,7 +578,7 @@ void rtl8192_phyConfigBB(struct net_device* dev, u8 ConfigType)
>> void rtl8192_InitBBRFRegDef(struct net_device* dev)
>> {
>> struct r8192_priv *priv = ieee80211_priv(dev);
>> -// RF Interface Sowrtware Control
>> +// RF Interface Software Control
>> priv->PHYRegDef[RF90_PATH_A].rfintfs = rFPGA0_XAB_RFInterfaceSW; // 16 LSBs if read 32-bit from 0x870
>> priv->PHYRegDef[RF90_PATH_B].rfintfs = rFPGA0_XAB_RFInterfaceSW; // 16 MSBs if read 32-bit from 0x870 (16-bit for 0x872)
>> priv->PHYRegDef[RF90_PATH_C].rfintfs = rFPGA0_XCD_RFInterfaceSW;// 16 LSBs if read 32-bit from 0x874
>> @@ -602,7 +602,7 @@ void rtl8192_InitBBRFRegDef(struct net_device* dev)
>> priv->PHYRegDef[RF90_PATH_C].rfintfe = rFPGA0_XC_RFInterfaceOE;// 16 MSBs if read 32-bit from 0x86A (16-bit for 0x86A)
>> priv->PHYRegDef[RF90_PATH_D].rfintfe = rFPGA0_XD_RFInterfaceOE;// 16 MSBs if read 32-bit from 0x86C (16-bit for 0x86E)
>>
>> - //Addr of LSSI. Wirte RF register by driver
>> + //Addr of LSSI. Write RF register by driver
>> priv->PHYRegDef[RF90_PATH_A].rf3wireOffset = rFPGA0_XA_LSSIParameter; //LSSI Parameter
>> priv->PHYRegDef[RF90_PATH_B].rf3wireOffset = rFPGA0_XB_LSSIParameter;
>> priv->PHYRegDef[RF90_PATH_C].rf3wireOffset = rFPGA0_XC_LSSIParameter;
>> @@ -1384,7 +1384,7 @@ u8 rtl8192_phy_SwChnlStepByStep(struct net_device *dev, u8 channel, u8* stage, u
>> }
>>
>> /******************************************************************************
>> - *function: This function does acturally set channel work
>> + *function: This function does actually set channel work
>> * input: struct net_device *dev
>> * u8 channel
>> * output: none
>> @@ -1425,7 +1425,7 @@ void rtl8192_SwChnl_WorkItem(struct net_device *dev)
>> }
>>
>> /******************************************************************************
>> - *function: This function scheduled actural workitem to set channel
>> + *function: This function scheduled actual workitem to set channel
>
> Shouldn't "workitem" be two words "work item" ?
>
>
>> * input: net_device dev
>> * u8 channel //channel to set
>> * output: none
>> diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phyreg.h b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phyreg.h
>> index 06b0b53..50f24dc 100644
>> --- a/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phyreg.h
>> +++ b/drivers/staging/rtl8192u/r819xU_phyreg.h
>> @@ -443,7 +443,7 @@
>> #define bCCKRxIG 0x7f00
>> #define bCCKLNAPolarity 0x800000
>> #define bCCKRx1stGain 0x7f0000
>> -#define bCCKRFExtend 0x20000000 //CCK Rx Iinital gain polarity
>> +#define bCCKRFExtend 0x20000000 //CCK Rx inital gain polarity
>> #define bCCKRxAGCSatLevel 0x1f000000
>> #define bCCKRxAGCSatCount 0xe0
>> #define bCCKRxRFSettle 0x1f //AGCsamp_dly
>>
>
>


yeah let me go through this and resend on top of the one I just sent..

Justin P. Mattock


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-30 23:01    [W:0.070 / U:0.032 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site