Messages in this thread | | | From | Kay Sievers <> | Date | Tue, 3 Apr 2012 18:20:16 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] printk(): add KERN_CONT where needed |
| |
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 18:16, Joe Perches <joe@perches.com> wrote: > Conversations happen all over the place and making > separate discussions isn't that valuable nor are > they really controllable.
Sure, but this is not a conversation in that sense, you reply to a patch that something is not correct, but what's not correct is not a subject of the patch. And that I need to correct.
> Just write the change log to simply state "add KERN_CONT" > without mentioning your unpublished stuff.
The changelog says:
"A prototype for kmsg records instead of a byte-stream buffer revealed a couple of missing printk(KERN_CONT ...) uses. Subsequent calls produce one record per printk() call, while all should have ended up in a single record."
What else do you need?
Kay
| |