lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [29]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [RFC] vmalloc: add warning in __vmalloc
On 04/28/2012 07:00 AM, Andrew Morton wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Apr 2012 17:42:24 +0900
> Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org> wrote:
>
>> Now there are several places to use __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC,
>> GFP_NOIO, GFP_NOFS but unfortunately __vmalloc calls map_vm_area
>> which calls alloc_pages with GFP_KERNEL to allocate page tables.
>> It means it's possible to happen deadlock.
>> I don't know why it doesn't have reported until now.
>>
>> Firstly, I tried passing gfp_t to lower functions to support __vmalloc
>> with such flags but other mm guys don't want and decided that
>> all of caller should be fixed.
>>
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=133517143616544&w=2
>>
>> To begin with, let's listen other's opinion whether they can fix it
>> by other approach without calling __vmalloc with such flags.
>>
>> So this patch adds warning to detect and to be fixed hopely.
>> I Cced related maintainers.
>> If I miss someone, please Cced them.
>>
>> side-note:
>> I added WARN_ON instead of WARN_ONCE to detect all of callers
>> and each WARN_ON for each flag to detect to use any flag easily.
>> After we fix all of caller or reduce such caller, we can merge
>> a warning with WARN_ONCE.
>
> Just WARN_ONCE, please. If that exposes some sort of calamity then we
> can reconsider.


NP.

>
>>
>> ...
>>
>> --- a/mm/vmalloc.c
>> +++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
>> @@ -1700,6 +1700,15 @@ static void *__vmalloc_node(unsigned long size, unsigned long align,
>> gfp_t gfp_mask, pgprot_t prot,
>> int node, void *caller)
>> {
>> + /*
>> + * This function calls map_vm_area so that it allocates
>> + * page table with GFP_KERNEL so caller should avoid using
>> + * GFP_NOIO, GFP_NOFS and !__GFP_WAIT.
>> + */
>> + WARN_ON(!(gfp_mask & __GFP_WAIT));
>> + WARN_ON(!(gfp_mask & __GFP_IO));
>> + WARN_ON(!(gfp_mask & __GFP_FS));
>> +
>> return __vmalloc_node_range(size, align, VMALLOC_START, VMALLOC_END,
>> gfp_mask, prot, node, caller);
>> }
>
> This seems strange. There are many entry points to this code and the
> patch appears to go into a randomly-chosen middle point in the various
> call chains and sticks a check in there. Why was __vmalloc_node()
> chosen? Does this provide full coverage or all entry points?


I think it covers all of caller with calls __vmalloc with gfp_flags.
Only exception is __vmalloc_node_range which is called by module_alloc
but it surely calls __vmalloc_node_range with GFP_KERNEL so it's no problem now.
If you want to catch potential use of __vmalloc_node_range in future, I can move it
to it.

>
>
>
> Also, the patch won't warn in the most problematic cases such as
> vmalloc() being called from a __GFP_NOFS context. Presumably there are


I agree but this patch's goal is just to prevent calling __vmalloc with GFP_ATOMIC, GFP_NOFS and
GFP_NOIO. We should consider vmalloc on __GFP_NOFS context as another problem and maybe
reclaimfs lockdep would be a good start point.

> might_sleep() warnings somewhere on the allocation path which will

> catch vmalloc() being called from atomic contexts.


Yes.

>
> I'm not sure what to do about that - we don't have machinery in place
> to be able to detect when a GFP_KERNEL allocation is deadlockable.
> Perhaps a lot of hacking on lockdep might get us this - we'd need to
> teach lockdep about which locks prohibit FS entry, which locks prevent
> IO entry, etc. And there are secret locks such as ext3/4
> journal_start(), and bitlocks and lock_page(). eek.

>

> --
> To unsubscribe, send a message with 'unsubscribe linux-mm' in
> the body to majordomo@kvack.org. For more info on Linux MM,
> see: http://www.linux-mm.org/ .
> Fight unfair telecom internet charges in Canada: sign http://stopthemeter.ca/
> Don't email: <a href=mailto:"dont@kvack.org"> email@kvack.org </a>
>



--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-30 04:21    [W:1.615 / U:0.008 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site