Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Apr 2012 18:57:31 +0200 | From | Borislav Petkov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/3] AMD thresholding fixes |
| |
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 04:49:52PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote: > > If there are no issues, I'll add the queue to linux-next (I don't see a > > branch from ras.git in linux-next, btw, which is strange). > > Patches so far have been flowing from "ras" to "tip" to "linus". It > hasn't quite been clear how linux-next fits into this. If we export > to -next, then are we planning on sending those directly to linus, > bypassing tip?
That's actually a good point. Once in -tip, they're seeing linux-next anyway.
Ok, Ingo, what would you guys rather have:
* ras tree -> linux-next -> we send pull request to Linus
or
* ras tree -> -tip -> linux-next (automatically due to tip daily merges) -> you send pull request to Linus
I guess I'm fine with both, second one makes us even lazier :)
Thanks.
-- Regards/Gruss, Boris.
| |