Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 25 Apr 2012 11:44:22 -0300 | From | Glauber Costa <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 17/23] kmem controller charge/uncharge infrastructure |
| |
> > About kmem, if we count task_struct, page tables, etc...which can be freed by > OOM-Killer i.e. it's allocated for 'process', should be aware of OOM problem. > Using mm->owner makes sense to me until someone finds a great idea to handle > OOM situation rather than task killing. >
noted, will update.
| |