lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [24]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH V1 2/2] i2c: tegra: support for I2C_M_NOSTART protocol mangling
> > * We should allocate a new functionality flag for it.
> > * We should update the documentation to reflect the two use cases.
>
> That sounds like a good plan. I'll try to get round to it if nobody
> beats me to it.

Would it make sense to make all four I2C_M_* mangling features seperate
I2C_FUNC_* options? The old I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING could then be all
four (seperately) exposed mangling features ORed. That's what I was
wondering when looking at the patch.

Regards,

Wolfram

--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
[unhandled content-type:application/pgp-signature]
\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-24 15:05    [W:0.969 / U:0.068 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site