lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [23]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: Inconsistent load average on tickless kernels
From
Date
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 12:57 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote:
> Lesław Kopeć wrote:
>
> > 2.6.32.55-hz-0f004f5a69 9.88
> > 2.6.32.55-no-hz-74f5187ac8 2.48
> > 2.6.32.55-no-hz-c308b56b53 2.22
> > 3.0.28-hz 10.66
> > 3.0.28-no-hz 0.60
> > 3.0.28-no-hz-c308b56b53 4.09
> > 3.0.28-no-hz-c308b56b53 nohz=off 6.78
> > 3.2.12-hz 10.16
> > 3.2.12-no-hz 0.66
> > 3.2.12-no-hz-c308b56b53 4.36
> >
> > What's worth noting is that I haven't seen any nasty side effects of the
> > latest patch on all kernel versions that I've tested. Hope that helps.
>
> Ok.
>
> Peter, do you think it would make sense to add c308b56b53987 to 3.0.y
> and newer stable kernels?

If anybody is still maintaining those and cares enough to do the work,
sure whatever.. ;)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/

\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-23 22:23    [W:0.076 / U:0.084 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site