Messages in this thread | | | Subject | Re: Inconsistent load average on tickless kernels | From | Peter Zijlstra <> | Date | Mon, 23 Apr 2012 22:21:06 +0200 |
| |
On Mon, 2012-04-23 at 12:57 -0500, Jonathan Nieder wrote: > Lesław Kopeć wrote: > > > 2.6.32.55-hz-0f004f5a69 9.88 > > 2.6.32.55-no-hz-74f5187ac8 2.48 > > 2.6.32.55-no-hz-c308b56b53 2.22 > > 3.0.28-hz 10.66 > > 3.0.28-no-hz 0.60 > > 3.0.28-no-hz-c308b56b53 4.09 > > 3.0.28-no-hz-c308b56b53 nohz=off 6.78 > > 3.2.12-hz 10.16 > > 3.2.12-no-hz 0.66 > > 3.2.12-no-hz-c308b56b53 4.36 > > > > What's worth noting is that I haven't seen any nasty side effects of the > > latest patch on all kernel versions that I've tested. Hope that helps. > > Ok. > > Peter, do you think it would make sense to add c308b56b53987 to 3.0.y > and newer stable kernels?
If anybody is still maintaining those and cares enough to do the work, sure whatever.. ;)
-- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |