Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 Apr 2012 23:26:54 +0200 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [PATCH 0/2] (Was: syscall_regfunc() && TIF_SYSCALL_TRACEPOINT) |
| |
Should I resend this or we do not really care?
The problem is minor, but both patches look like the simple and obvious bugfix to me.
On 04/01, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > On 03/31, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2012-03-31 at 22:45 +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > > > So what do you think we should do, > > > > > > - keep this check > > > > > > - remove it > > > > > > - remove it in a separate patch > > > > I say this one (remove it in a separate patch). That way if something > > breaks we know exactly what did it ;-) > > OK, agreed. > > Don't really know how can I test this... but the kernel didn't > crash after I enabled the syscall tracer ;) > > Oleg.
| |