Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 Apr 2012 20:58:36 +0200 | From | Oleg Nesterov <> | Subject | Re: [RFC 0/6] uprobes: kill uprobes_srcu/uprobe_srcu_id |
| |
On 04/20, Srikar Dronamraju wrote: > > Yes, We install breakpoints unconditionally, I think we had already > discussed this and Oleg had proposed a solution too. > http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/6/16/470 where we move the mm struct from task > struct to signal struct.
Yes, this too.
Hmm. May be we can do something else? Currently uprobe_consumer->filter() returns a boolean. Perhaps it can return "yes" || "no" || "remove_bp" ? But then another uprobe_register(same_addr) should handle this case somehow. Just a crazy idea, unlikely it makes sense.
Oleg.
| |