lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [20]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [patch 00/18] SMP: Boot and CPU hotplug refactoring - Part 1
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012, Peter Zijlstra wrote:

> On Fri, 2012-04-20 at 08:42 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
> > I'm still leaning towards restricting kthreadd and any PF_THREAD_BOUND
> > threads in the root cgroup.
>
> I'd definitely agree with restricting those.
>
> > I'm not sure about !BOUND kthreads tho.
> > It doesn't make sense for the most part but there are cases
> > (e.g. crypto kthreads) which might make some sense.
> >
> Agreed as well. There are a few nasty corner cases with unbound
> workqueues vs allowing cgroups (as how to place new worker threads
> correctly etc..). Sorting that is a 'fun' next problem.
>
> Could we merge the kthreadd/PF_THREAD_BOUND restriction? You've got my
> ACK and I'm fairly sure tglx will ACK it as well.

Acked-and-appreciated-by-me


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-20 17:59    [W:0.243 / U:0.028 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site