Messages in this thread | | | Date | Fri, 20 Apr 2012 02:32:52 +0400 | From | Cyrill Gorcunov <> | Subject | Re: + c-r-prctl-add-ability-to-set-new-mm_struct-exe_file-update-after-mm- num_exe_file_vmas-removal.patch added to -mm tree |
| |
On Fri, Apr 20, 2012 at 12:09:19AM +0200, Oleg Nesterov wrote: > > > > I guess maybe it's time to drop one-shot requirement and as result > > we can drop MMF_EXE_FILE_CHANGED bit completely, > > Plus perhaps we can remove this for_each_vma check? > > > making overall code simplier? > > Personally I'd certainly prefer this ;) > > But let me repeat to avoid the confusion. I am fine either way, > I am not going to discuss this again unless I see something which > looks technically wrong. And the current MMF_EXE_FILE_CHANGED > doesn't look right even if the problem is minor.
So if there no stong agrues against, lets rip all together -- and for_each_vma and MMF_EXE_FILE_CHANGED bits, finally making code simplier.
Cyrill
| |