lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [19]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
SubjectRe: [PATCH] xtensa: fix build failure in xtensa/kernel/signal.c
From
Date
On Thu, 2012-04-19 at 08:46 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> On 12-04-19 03:45 AM, Matt Fleming wrote:
> > On Wed, 2012-04-18 at 16:50 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> >> Caused by commit 3785006ac3c8941feb63097c416de92114a6bc39
> >>
> >> "xtensa: don't mask signals if we fail to setup signal stack"
> >>
> >> It assigns a return value to "ret", but there is no such variable
> >> anywhere in scope. Create one.
> >>
> >> Cc: Matt Fleming <matt.fleming@intel.com>
> >> Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
> >> Cc: Chris Zankel <chris@zankel.net>
> >> Signed-off-by: Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
> >>
> >> diff --git a/arch/xtensa/kernel/signal.c b/arch/xtensa/kernel/signal.c
> >> index b69b000..d78869a 100644
> >> --- a/arch/xtensa/kernel/signal.c
> >> +++ b/arch/xtensa/kernel/signal.c
> >> @@ -496,6 +496,7 @@ int do_signal(struct pt_regs *regs, sigset_t *oldset)
> >> signr = get_signal_to_deliver(&info, &ka, regs, NULL);
> >>
> >> if (signr > 0) {
> >> + int ret;
> >>
> >> /* Are we from a system call? */
> >>
> >
> > Whoops! Thanks Paul, that's my bad. Looks like I went code-blind after
> > making the same kinds of changes to lots of different architectures.
> >
> > I've added Andrew to the Cc list since he picked up the last set of
> > xtensa signal patches.
>
> Looks like I'll have a queue of build fixes from various other less
> common architectures, so I can carry this one in my for-3.4 queue
> (since 3785006a is already in master).
>
> I'll add an acked-by from you.

Sure, that's fine by me.



\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-19 15:05    [W:0.051 / U:0.024 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site