Messages in this thread | | | From | KOSAKI Motohiro <> | Date | Wed, 11 Apr 2012 15:20:10 -0400 | Subject | Re: [PATCH] nextfd(2) |
| |
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 2:00 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@zytor.com> wrote: > On 04/10/2012 05:09 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote: >> >> I know the reason. fcntl(F_NEXT) is one of a proposal of next SUS enhancement. >> >> http://austingroupbugs.net/view.php?id=149 >> >> nextfd() has a semantics of F_NEXT. >> > > Looking at that bug report, it sounds like that proposal was rejected.
?
If I understand correctly, above URL says, latest satatus is
Resolution: Accepted As Marked
Please see toppest issue summary. Or if I am missing something, can you please point out which line are you seeing? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |