lkml.org 
[lkml]   [2012]   [Apr]   [11]   [last100]   RSS Feed
Views: [wrap][no wrap]   [headers]  [forward] 
 
Messages in this thread
/
Date
From
SubjectRe: [PATCH 00/13] KVM: MMU: fast page fault
On Tue, 10 Apr 2012 19:58:44 +0800
Xiao Guangrong <xiaoguangrong@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:

> No, i do not really agree with that.
>
> We really can get great benefit from O(1) especially if lockless write-protect
> is introduced for O(1), live migration is very useful for cloud computing
> architecture to balance the overload on all nodes.

Recently, you said to me that you were not familiar with live migration.
Actually you did not know the basics of pre-copy live migration.

I know live migration better than you because NTT has Kemari and it uses
live migration infrastructure. My work is originated from the data
I got during profiling Kemari.

SRCU-less dirty logging was also motivated by the pressures from scheduler
developers. Everything was really needed.


Have you ever used live migration for real service?

I cannot say whether O(1) is OK with me without any real background.

Takuya


\
 
 \ /
  Last update: 2012-04-11 14:17    [W:0.105 / U:0.168 seconds]
©2003-2020 Jasper Spaans|hosted at Digital Ocean and TransIP|Read the blog|Advertise on this site