Messages in this thread | | | Date | Tue, 10 Apr 2012 10:18:23 +0200 | Subject | Re: [PATCH V4 REPOST 2/5] dt: pinctrl: Document device tree binding | From | Linus Walleij <> |
| |
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@wwwdotorg.org> wrote:
> From: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> > > The core pin controller bindings define: > * The fact that pin controllers expose pin configurations as nodes in > device tree. > * That the bindings for those pin configuration nodes is defined by the > individual pin controller drivers. > * A standardized set of properties for client devices to define numbered > or named pin configuration states, each referring to some number of the > afore-mentioned pin configuration nodes. > * That the bindings for the client devices determines the set of numbered > or named states that must exist. > > Signed-off-by: Stephen Warren <swarren@nvidia.com> > Acked-by: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@linaro.org> > Acked-by: Tony Lindgren <tony@atomide.com> > Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org> > Acked-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org> > Acked-by: Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@linaro.org>
Would be nice to have an ACK from Grant or Rob but the massive set of ACKs at the end still makes me tentatively apply this patch for the pinctrl tree.
Yours, Linus Walleij -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |