| Date | Tue, 10 Apr 2012 16:41:37 +0300 (EEST) | From | Aaro Koskinen <> | Subject | Re: [PATCHv24 00/16] Contiguous Memory Allocator |
| |
Hi,
On Tue, 3 Apr 2012, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > This is (yet another) update of CMA patches.
How well CMA is supposed to work if you have mlocked processes? I've been testing these patches, and noticed that by creating a small mlocked process you start to get plenty of test_pages_isolated() failure warnings, and bigger allocations will always fail.
A.
|