Messages in this thread | | | Date | Wed, 7 Mar 2012 10:46:37 +0100 | Subject | Re: linux-next: triage for March 6, 2012 | From | Geert Uytterhoeven <> |
| |
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 03:43, Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com> wrote: > Due to the nature of the commits I've been making lately, when I see > a fail in linux-next, I have to wonder if I somehow caused it by a > header shuffle. After pouring over the kisskb linux-next results, > I realized that I can't be the only one doing this, and that a triage > summary of the linux-next fails should in theory be useful to a > bunch of people doing similar to what I do.
Indeed. Unfortunately I don't have the bandwidth to do daily regression summaries for linux-next, like I do for Linus' releases.
I haven't uploaded my scripts to kernel.org after the resurrection, but you may be able to get linux-log-diff.pl and linux-log-summary.pl from an old mirror.
Gr{oetje,eeting}s,
Geert
-- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@linux-m68k.org
In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
| |